Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johnson, Angela
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01390
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917683271827456
author Johnson, Angela
author_facet Johnson, Angela
contents This article provides resources to design effective diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) interventions in physics settings. It summarizes critiques of DEI interventions and reviews research findings suggesting that DEI interventions show modest but positive benefits. It covers physics-specific concerns around DEI (resistance from skeptical participants, unintended negative consequences for members of minoritized groups). The article then explores six design questions: 1) What are the intended outcomes of the intervention? (with a list of possible outcomes) 2) How will the intervention be justified to participants? 3) Will the intervention be voluntary or required? 4) Who will the participants be? 5) What activities will the intervention consist of? (with suggested activities paired to outcomes) 6) How will you know whether the intervention worked? (with tools used by other researchers to measure particular outcomes, and bonus suggestions for how to carry out publication-worthy evaluations). Each question is explored using research results and recommendations, and illustrated using examples from physics and other STEM settings.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_01390
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle How to design research-aligned DEI interventions in physics
Johnson, Angela
Physics Education
This article provides resources to design effective diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) interventions in physics settings. It summarizes critiques of DEI interventions and reviews research findings suggesting that DEI interventions show modest but positive benefits. It covers physics-specific concerns around DEI (resistance from skeptical participants, unintended negative consequences for members of minoritized groups). The article then explores six design questions: 1) What are the intended outcomes of the intervention? (with a list of possible outcomes) 2) How will the intervention be justified to participants? 3) Will the intervention be voluntary or required? 4) Who will the participants be? 5) What activities will the intervention consist of? (with suggested activities paired to outcomes) 6) How will you know whether the intervention worked? (with tools used by other researchers to measure particular outcomes, and bonus suggestions for how to carry out publication-worthy evaluations). Each question is explored using research results and recommendations, and illustrated using examples from physics and other STEM settings.
title How to design research-aligned DEI interventions in physics
topic Physics Education
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01390