#EpiTwitter: Public Health Messaging During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Rao, Ashwin, Sabri, Nazanin, Guo, Siyi, Raschid, Louiqa, Lerman, Kristina
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866914831066464256
author Rao, Ashwin
Sabri, Nazanin
Guo, Siyi
Raschid, Louiqa
Lerman, Kristina
author_facet Rao, Ashwin
Sabri, Nazanin
Guo, Siyi
Raschid, Louiqa
Lerman, Kristina
contents Effective communication during health crises is critical, with social media serving as a key platform for public health experts (PHEs) to engage with the public. However, it also amplifies pseudo-experts promoting contrarian views. Despite its importance, the role of emotional and moral language in PHEs' communication during COVID-19 remains under explored. This study examines how PHEs and pseudo-experts communicated on Twitter during the pandemic, focusing on emotional and moral language and their engagement with political elites. Analyzing tweets from 489 PHEs and 356 pseudo-experts from January 2020 to January 2021, alongside public responses, we identified key priorities and differences in messaging strategy. PHEs prioritize masking, healthcare, education, and vaccines, using positive emotional language like optimism. In contrast, pseudo-experts discuss therapeutics and lockdowns more frequently, employing negative emotions like pessimism and disgust. Negative emotional and moral language tends to drive engagement, but positive language from PHEs fosters positivity in public responses. PHEs exhibit liberal partisanship, expressing more positivity towards liberals and negativity towards conservative elites, while pseudo-experts show conservative partisanship. These findings shed light on the polarization of COVID-19 discourse and underscore the importance of strategic use of emotional and moral language by experts to mitigate polarization and enhance public trust.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_01866
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle #EpiTwitter: Public Health Messaging During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Rao, Ashwin
Sabri, Nazanin
Guo, Siyi
Raschid, Louiqa
Lerman, Kristina
Computation and Language
Computers and Society
Social and Information Networks
Effective communication during health crises is critical, with social media serving as a key platform for public health experts (PHEs) to engage with the public. However, it also amplifies pseudo-experts promoting contrarian views. Despite its importance, the role of emotional and moral language in PHEs' communication during COVID-19 remains under explored. This study examines how PHEs and pseudo-experts communicated on Twitter during the pandemic, focusing on emotional and moral language and their engagement with political elites. Analyzing tweets from 489 PHEs and 356 pseudo-experts from January 2020 to January 2021, alongside public responses, we identified key priorities and differences in messaging strategy. PHEs prioritize masking, healthcare, education, and vaccines, using positive emotional language like optimism. In contrast, pseudo-experts discuss therapeutics and lockdowns more frequently, employing negative emotions like pessimism and disgust. Negative emotional and moral language tends to drive engagement, but positive language from PHEs fosters positivity in public responses. PHEs exhibit liberal partisanship, expressing more positivity towards liberals and negativity towards conservative elites, while pseudo-experts show conservative partisanship. These findings shed light on the polarization of COVID-19 discourse and underscore the importance of strategic use of emotional and moral language by experts to mitigate polarization and enhance public trust.
title #EpiTwitter: Public Health Messaging During the COVID-19 Pandemic
topic Computation and Language
Computers and Society
Social and Information Networks
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01866