Quantifying Misalignment Between Agents: Towards a Sociotechnical Understanding of Alignment

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Kierans, Aidan, Ghosh, Avijit, Hazan, Hananel, Dori-Hacohen, Shiri
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866918042266501120
author Kierans, Aidan
Ghosh, Avijit
Hazan, Hananel
Dori-Hacohen, Shiri
author_facet Kierans, Aidan
Ghosh, Avijit
Hazan, Hananel
Dori-Hacohen, Shiri
contents Existing work on the alignment problem has focused mainly on (1) qualitative descriptions of the alignment problem; (2) attempting to align AI actions with human interests by focusing on value specification and learning; and/or (3) focusing on a single agent or on humanity as a monolith. Recent sociotechnical approaches highlight the need to understand complex misalignment among multiple human and AI agents. We address this gap by adapting a computational social science model of human contention to the alignment problem. Our model quantifies misalignment in large, diverse agent groups with potentially conflicting goals across various problem areas. Misalignment scores in our framework depend on the observed agent population, the domain in question, and conflict between agents' weighted preferences. Through simulations, we demonstrate how our model captures intuitive aspects of misalignment across different scenarios. We then apply our model to two case studies, including an autonomous vehicle setting, showcasing its practical utility. Our approach offers enhanced explanatory power for complex sociotechnical environments and could inform the design of more aligned AI systems in real-world applications.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_04231
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Quantifying Misalignment Between Agents: Towards a Sociotechnical Understanding of Alignment
Kierans, Aidan
Ghosh, Avijit
Hazan, Hananel
Dori-Hacohen, Shiri
Multiagent Systems
Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
Computer Science and Game Theory
I.2.11; K.4.m
Existing work on the alignment problem has focused mainly on (1) qualitative descriptions of the alignment problem; (2) attempting to align AI actions with human interests by focusing on value specification and learning; and/or (3) focusing on a single agent or on humanity as a monolith. Recent sociotechnical approaches highlight the need to understand complex misalignment among multiple human and AI agents. We address this gap by adapting a computational social science model of human contention to the alignment problem. Our model quantifies misalignment in large, diverse agent groups with potentially conflicting goals across various problem areas. Misalignment scores in our framework depend on the observed agent population, the domain in question, and conflict between agents' weighted preferences. Through simulations, we demonstrate how our model captures intuitive aspects of misalignment across different scenarios. We then apply our model to two case studies, including an autonomous vehicle setting, showcasing its practical utility. Our approach offers enhanced explanatory power for complex sociotechnical environments and could inform the design of more aligned AI systems in real-world applications.
title Quantifying Misalignment Between Agents: Towards a Sociotechnical Understanding of Alignment
topic Multiagent Systems
Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
Computer Science and Game Theory
I.2.11; K.4.m
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04231