$T_c$ and the elastocaloric effect of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ under $\langle 110 \rangle$ uniaxial stress: no indications of transition splitting

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jerzembeck, Fabian, Li, You-Sheng, Palle, Grgur, Hu, Zhenhai, Biderang, Mehdi, Kikugawa, Naoki, Sokolov, Dmitry A., Ghosh, Sayak, Ramshaw, Brad J., Scaffidi, Thomas, Nicklas, Michael, Schmalian, Jörg, Mackenzie, Andrew P., Hicks, Clifford W.
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866914924790284288
author Jerzembeck, Fabian
Li, You-Sheng
Palle, Grgur
Hu, Zhenhai
Biderang, Mehdi
Kikugawa, Naoki
Sokolov, Dmitry A.
Ghosh, Sayak
Ramshaw, Brad J.
Scaffidi, Thomas
Nicklas, Michael
Schmalian, Jörg
Mackenzie, Andrew P.
Hicks, Clifford W.
author_facet Jerzembeck, Fabian
Li, You-Sheng
Palle, Grgur
Hu, Zhenhai
Biderang, Mehdi
Kikugawa, Naoki
Sokolov, Dmitry A.
Ghosh, Sayak
Ramshaw, Brad J.
Scaffidi, Thomas
Nicklas, Michael
Schmalian, Jörg
Mackenzie, Andrew P.
Hicks, Clifford W.
contents There is considerable evidence that the superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 has two components. Among this evidence is a jump in the shear elastic modulus $c_{66}$ at the critical temperature $T_c$, observed in ultrasound measurements. Such a jump is forbidden for homogeneous single-component order parameters, and implies that $T_c$ should develop as a cusp under the application of shear strain with $\langle 110 \rangle$ principal axes. This shear strain should split the onset temperatures of the two components, if they coexist, or select one component if they do not. Here, we report measurements of $T_c$ and the elastocaloric effect of Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial stress applied along the $[110]$ lattice direction. Within experimental resolution, we resolve neither a cusp in the stress dependence of $T_c$, nor any second transition in the elastocaloric effect data. We show that reconciling these null results with the observed jumps in $c_{66}$ requires extraordinarily fine tuning to a triple point of the Ginzburg-Landau parameter space. In addition, our results are inconsistent with homogeneous time reversal symmetry breaking at a temperature $T_2 \leq T_c$ as identified in muon spin relaxation experiments.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_04717
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle $T_c$ and the elastocaloric effect of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ under $\langle 110 \rangle$ uniaxial stress: no indications of transition splitting
Jerzembeck, Fabian
Li, You-Sheng
Palle, Grgur
Hu, Zhenhai
Biderang, Mehdi
Kikugawa, Naoki
Sokolov, Dmitry A.
Ghosh, Sayak
Ramshaw, Brad J.
Scaffidi, Thomas
Nicklas, Michael
Schmalian, Jörg
Mackenzie, Andrew P.
Hicks, Clifford W.
Superconductivity
Strongly Correlated Electrons
There is considerable evidence that the superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 has two components. Among this evidence is a jump in the shear elastic modulus $c_{66}$ at the critical temperature $T_c$, observed in ultrasound measurements. Such a jump is forbidden for homogeneous single-component order parameters, and implies that $T_c$ should develop as a cusp under the application of shear strain with $\langle 110 \rangle$ principal axes. This shear strain should split the onset temperatures of the two components, if they coexist, or select one component if they do not. Here, we report measurements of $T_c$ and the elastocaloric effect of Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial stress applied along the $[110]$ lattice direction. Within experimental resolution, we resolve neither a cusp in the stress dependence of $T_c$, nor any second transition in the elastocaloric effect data. We show that reconciling these null results with the observed jumps in $c_{66}$ requires extraordinarily fine tuning to a triple point of the Ginzburg-Landau parameter space. In addition, our results are inconsistent with homogeneous time reversal symmetry breaking at a temperature $T_2 \leq T_c$ as identified in muon spin relaxation experiments.
title $T_c$ and the elastocaloric effect of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ under $\langle 110 \rangle$ uniaxial stress: no indications of transition splitting
topic Superconductivity
Strongly Correlated Electrons
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04717