Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karam, Shriya, Shanos, Lauren, Ford, Jessica, Castaneda, Lorenzo, Ryerson, Megan S., Vohra, Rakesh
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05542
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911910663815168
author Karam, Shriya
Shanos, Lauren
Ford, Jessica
Castaneda, Lorenzo
Ryerson, Megan S.
Vohra, Rakesh
author_facet Karam, Shriya
Shanos, Lauren
Ford, Jessica
Castaneda, Lorenzo
Ryerson, Megan S.
Vohra, Rakesh
contents After the repeal of Roe vs. Wade in June 2022, women face long-distance travel across state lines to access abortion care. For women who also face socioeconomic hardship, travel for abortion care is a significant burden. To ease this burden, abortion access nonprofits are funding and/or supplying transportation to abortion clinics. However, due to the uneven distribution of demand and supply for abortions, these nonprofits do not have efficient logistical operations. As a result, low-income, underserved women may not have access to adequate reproductive healthcare, thus widening healthcare inequity gaps. Nonprofits may also risk not serving the needs of vulnerable women without access to adequate reproductive healthcare, and in doing so, waste resources, money, and volunteer hours. To address these challenges, we create an interactive, web-based planning tool, the Reproductive Healthcare Equity Algorithm (RHEA), to guide nonprofits in strategically allocating resources and serving demand. RHEA leverages an optimization model to determine the maximum flow and minimum transportation cost to route women across a network of counties and abortion clinics, subject to transportation supply, budget, and time constraints for one day of operations for a nonprofit. In doing so, we collaborate with abortion access nonprofits to cater our model design and interface development to their needs and considerations. Ultimately, we seek to optimize resource allocation for nonprofits providing abortion care logistics and improve abortion access for low-income, underserved women.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_05542
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle The Development of the Reproductive Healthcare Equity Algorithm (RHEA)
Karam, Shriya
Shanos, Lauren
Ford, Jessica
Castaneda, Lorenzo
Ryerson, Megan S.
Vohra, Rakesh
Systems and Control
After the repeal of Roe vs. Wade in June 2022, women face long-distance travel across state lines to access abortion care. For women who also face socioeconomic hardship, travel for abortion care is a significant burden. To ease this burden, abortion access nonprofits are funding and/or supplying transportation to abortion clinics. However, due to the uneven distribution of demand and supply for abortions, these nonprofits do not have efficient logistical operations. As a result, low-income, underserved women may not have access to adequate reproductive healthcare, thus widening healthcare inequity gaps. Nonprofits may also risk not serving the needs of vulnerable women without access to adequate reproductive healthcare, and in doing so, waste resources, money, and volunteer hours. To address these challenges, we create an interactive, web-based planning tool, the Reproductive Healthcare Equity Algorithm (RHEA), to guide nonprofits in strategically allocating resources and serving demand. RHEA leverages an optimization model to determine the maximum flow and minimum transportation cost to route women across a network of counties and abortion clinics, subject to transportation supply, budget, and time constraints for one day of operations for a nonprofit. In doing so, we collaborate with abortion access nonprofits to cater our model design and interface development to their needs and considerations. Ultimately, we seek to optimize resource allocation for nonprofits providing abortion care logistics and improve abortion access for low-income, underserved women.
title The Development of the Reproductive Healthcare Equity Algorithm (RHEA)
topic Systems and Control
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05542