Algorithms for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Efficiency Analysis Problems

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Liu, Fuh-Hwa Franklin, Shih, Su-Chuan
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866910479594553344
author Liu, Fuh-Hwa Franklin
Shih, Su-Chuan
author_facet Liu, Fuh-Hwa Franklin
Shih, Su-Chuan
contents Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems involve the evaluation of alternatives based on various minimization and maximization criteria. Similarly, efficiency evaluation (EA) methods assess decision-making units (DMUs) by analyzing their input consumption and output production. MCDM and EA methods face challenges in managing alternatives and DMUs with varying capacities across different criteria (inputs and outputs). That leads to performance assessments often skewed by subjective biases in criteria weighting. We introduce two innovative scenarios utilizing linear programming-based Virtual Gap Analysis (VGA) models to address these limitations. This dual-scenario approach aims to mitigate traditional biases, offering robust solutions for comprehensively assessing alternatives and DMUs. Our methodology allows for the influential ranking of alternatives in MCDM problems and enables each DMU to adjust its input and output ratios to achieve efficiency.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_06090
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Algorithms for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Efficiency Analysis Problems
Liu, Fuh-Hwa Franklin
Shih, Su-Chuan
Optimization and Control
90B50, 90C29, 90C08, 91A80, 91B06
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems involve the evaluation of alternatives based on various minimization and maximization criteria. Similarly, efficiency evaluation (EA) methods assess decision-making units (DMUs) by analyzing their input consumption and output production. MCDM and EA methods face challenges in managing alternatives and DMUs with varying capacities across different criteria (inputs and outputs). That leads to performance assessments often skewed by subjective biases in criteria weighting. We introduce two innovative scenarios utilizing linear programming-based Virtual Gap Analysis (VGA) models to address these limitations. This dual-scenario approach aims to mitigate traditional biases, offering robust solutions for comprehensively assessing alternatives and DMUs. Our methodology allows for the influential ranking of alternatives in MCDM problems and enables each DMU to adjust its input and output ratios to achieve efficiency.
title Algorithms for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Efficiency Analysis Problems
topic Optimization and Control
90B50, 90C29, 90C08, 91A80, 91B06
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06090