Banal Deception Human-AI Ecosystems: A Study of People's Perceptions of LLM-generated Deceptive Behaviour

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhan, Xiao, Xu, Yifan, Abdi, Noura, Collenette, Joe, Abu-Salma, Ruba, Sarkadi, Stefan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909871816835072
author Zhan, Xiao
Xu, Yifan
Abdi, Noura
Collenette, Joe
Abu-Salma, Ruba
Sarkadi, Stefan
author_facet Zhan, Xiao
Xu, Yifan
Abdi, Noura
Collenette, Joe
Abu-Salma, Ruba
Sarkadi, Stefan
contents Large language models (LLMs) can provide users with false, inaccurate, or misleading information, and we consider the output of this type of information as what Natale (2021) calls `banal' deceptive behaviour. Here, we investigate peoples' perceptions of ChatGPT-generated deceptive behaviour and how this affects peoples' own behaviour and trust. To do this, we use a mixed-methods approach comprising of (i) an online survey with 220 participants and (ii) semi-structured interviews with 12 participants. Our results show that (i) the most common types of deceptive information encountered were over-simplifications and outdated information; (ii) humans' perceptions of trust and `worthiness' of talking to ChatGPT are impacted by `banal' deceptive behaviour; (iii) the perceived responsibility for deception is influenced by education level and the frequency of deceptive information; and (iv) users become more cautious after encountering deceptive information, but they come to trust the technology more when they identify advantages of using it. Our findings contribute to the understanding of human-AI interaction dynamics in the context of \textit{Deceptive AI Ecosystems}, and highlight the importance of user-centric approaches to mitigating the potential harms of deceptive AI technologies.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_08386
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Banal Deception Human-AI Ecosystems: A Study of People's Perceptions of LLM-generated Deceptive Behaviour
Zhan, Xiao
Xu, Yifan
Abdi, Noura
Collenette, Joe
Abu-Salma, Ruba
Sarkadi, Stefan
Computers and Society
Large language models (LLMs) can provide users with false, inaccurate, or misleading information, and we consider the output of this type of information as what Natale (2021) calls `banal' deceptive behaviour. Here, we investigate peoples' perceptions of ChatGPT-generated deceptive behaviour and how this affects peoples' own behaviour and trust. To do this, we use a mixed-methods approach comprising of (i) an online survey with 220 participants and (ii) semi-structured interviews with 12 participants. Our results show that (i) the most common types of deceptive information encountered were over-simplifications and outdated information; (ii) humans' perceptions of trust and `worthiness' of talking to ChatGPT are impacted by `banal' deceptive behaviour; (iii) the perceived responsibility for deception is influenced by education level and the frequency of deceptive information; and (iv) users become more cautious after encountering deceptive information, but they come to trust the technology more when they identify advantages of using it. Our findings contribute to the understanding of human-AI interaction dynamics in the context of \textit{Deceptive AI Ecosystems}, and highlight the importance of user-centric approaches to mitigating the potential harms of deceptive AI technologies.
title Banal Deception Human-AI Ecosystems: A Study of People's Perceptions of LLM-generated Deceptive Behaviour
topic Computers and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08386