Cover Image

Towards Supporting Legal Argumentation with NLP: Is More Data Really All You Need?

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Santosh, T. Y. S. S, Ashley, Kevin D., Atkinson, Katie, Grabmair, Matthias
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2024
Subjects:	Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Is It Really Long Context if All You Need Is Retrieval? Towards Genuinely Difficult Long Context NLP
by: Goldman, Omer, et al.
Published: (2024)

More Agents Is All You Need
by: Li, Junyou, et al.
Published: (2024)

Towards Explainability and Fairness in Swiss Judgement Prediction: Benchmarking on a Multilingual Dataset
by: S, Santosh T. Y. S., et al.
Published: (2024)

Validating Political Position Predictions of Arguments
by: Robinson, Jordan, et al.
Published: (2026)

LexAbSumm: Aspect-based Summarization of Legal Decisions
by: Santosh, T. Y. S. S, et al.
Published: (2024)

LexSumm and LexT5: Benchmarking and Modeling Legal Summarization Tasks in English
by: Santosh, T. Y. S. S., et al.
Published: (2024)

CoPERLex: Content Planning with Event-based Representations for Legal Case Summarization
by: Santosh, T. Y. S. S., et al.
Published: (2025)

Mitigating Manipulation and Enhancing Persuasion: A Reflective Multi-Agent Approach for Legal Argument Generation
by: Zhang, Li, et al.
Published: (2025)

Contrast Is All You Need
by: Kilic, Burak, et al.
Published: (2023)

Training on the Benchmark Is Not All You Need
by: Ni, Shiwen, et al.
Published: (2024)

By Their Fruits You Will Know Them: Comparing Formalizations of Law by the Decisions They Encode
by: Vernie, Julius, et al.
Published: (2026)

Not All Documents Are What You Need for Extracting Instruction Tuning Data
by: Zhang, Chi, et al.
Published: (2025)

ChronosLex: Time-aware Incremental Training for Temporal Generalization of Legal Classification Tasks
by: Santosh, T. Y. S. S, et al.
Published: (2024)

Are More LLM Calls All You Need? Towards Scaling Laws of Compound Inference Systems
by: Chen, Lingjiao, et al.
Published: (2024)

Measuring Faithfulness and Abstention: An Automated Pipeline for Evaluating LLM-Generated 3-ply Case-Based Legal Arguments
by: Zhang, Li, et al.
Published: (2025)

Agents Are All You Need for LLM Unlearning
by: Sanyal, Debdeep, et al.
Published: (2025)

Query-driven Relevant Paragraph Extraction from Legal Judgments
by: Santosh, T. Y. S. S, et al.
Published: (2024)

Rethinking Data Selection at Scale: Random Selection is Almost All You Need
by: Xia, Tingyu, et al.
Published: (2024)

Scaling Law in LLM Simulated Personality: More Detailed and Realistic Persona Profile Is All You Need
by: Bai, Yuqi, et al.
Published: (2025)

RELexED: Retrieval-Enhanced Legal Summarization with Exemplar Diversity
by: Santosh, T. Y. S. S., et al.
Published: (2025)

More Compute Is What You Need
by: Guo, Zhen
Published: (2024)

Beyond Borders: Investigating Cross-Jurisdiction Transfer in Legal Case Summarization
by: Santosh, T. Y. S. S, et al.
Published: (2024)

Rho-1: Not All Tokens Are What You Need
by: Lin, Zhenghao, et al.
Published: (2024)

Synthetic Data RL: Task Definition Is All You Need
by: Guo, Yiduo, et al.
Published: (2025)

HiCuLR: Hierarchical Curriculum Learning for Rhetorical Role Labeling of Legal Documents
by: Santosh, T. Y. S. S., et al.
Published: (2024)

Mind Your Neighbours: Leveraging Analogous Instances for Rhetorical Role Labeling for Legal Documents
by: Santosh, T. Y. S. S, et al.
Published: (2024)

From Noise to Signal to Selbstzweck: Reframing Human Label Variation in the Era of Post-training in NLP
by: Xu, Shanshan, et al.
Published: (2025)

We Need to Measure Data Diversity in NLP -- Better and Broader
by: Nguyen, Dong, et al.
Published: (2025)

Using LLMs to Discover Legal Factors
by: Gray, Morgan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Is Depth All You Need? An Exploration of Iterative Reasoning in LLMs
by: Wu, Zongqian, et al.
Published: (2025)

Exploiting LLM-as-a-Judge Disposition on Free Text Legal QA via Prompt Optimization
by: Elganayni, Mohamed Hesham, et al.
Published: (2026)

LeCoPCR: Legal Concept-guided Prior Case Retrieval for European Court of Human Rights cases
by: Santosh, T. Y. S. S., et al.
Published: (2025)

Indian Legal NLP Benchmarks : A Survey
by: Kalamkar, Prathamesh, et al.
Published: (2021)

CourtPressGER: A German Court Decision to Press Release Summarization Dataset
by: Nagl, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2025)

BenGER: Benchmarking LLM Systems on Subsumption-Based Legal Reasoning in German Law
by: Nagl, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2026)

Why Low-Resource NLP Needs More Than Cross-Lingual Transfer: Lessons Learned from Luxembourgish
by: Philippy, Fred, et al.
Published: (2026)

Tensor Product Attention Is All You Need
by: Zhang, Yifan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Attention Smoothing Is All You Need For Unlearning
by: Zade, Saleh Zare, et al.
Published: (2026)

Incorporating Precedents for Legal Judgement Prediction on European Court of Human Rights Cases
by: Santosh, T. Y. S. S., et al.
Published: (2024)

Self-Verification is All You Need To Pass The Japanese Bar Examination
by: Shin, Andrew
Published: (2026)