When Reasoning Meets Information Aggregation: A Case Study with Sports Narratives

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Hu, Yebowen, Song, Kaiqiang, Cho, Sangwoo, Wang, Xiaoyang, Yao, Wenlin, Foroosh, Hassan, Yu, Dong, Liu, Fei
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866914963912654848
author Hu, Yebowen
Song, Kaiqiang
Cho, Sangwoo
Wang, Xiaoyang
Yao, Wenlin
Foroosh, Hassan
Yu, Dong
Liu, Fei
author_facet Hu, Yebowen
Song, Kaiqiang
Cho, Sangwoo
Wang, Xiaoyang
Yao, Wenlin
Foroosh, Hassan
Yu, Dong
Liu, Fei
contents Reasoning is most powerful when an LLM accurately aggregates relevant information. We examine the critical role of information aggregation in reasoning by requiring the LLM to analyze sports narratives. To succeed at this task, an LLM must infer points from actions, identify related entities, attribute points accurately to players and teams, and compile key statistics to draw conclusions. We conduct comprehensive experiments with real NBA basketball data and present SportsGen, a new method to synthesize game narratives. By synthesizing data, we can rigorously evaluate LLMs' reasoning capabilities under complex scenarios with varying narrative lengths and density of information. Our findings show that most models, including GPT-4o, often fail to accurately aggregate basketball scores due to frequent scoring patterns. Open-source models like Llama-3 further suffer from significant score hallucinations. Finally, the effectiveness of reasoning is influenced by narrative complexity, information density, and domain-specific terms, highlighting the challenges in analytical reasoning tasks.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_12084
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle When Reasoning Meets Information Aggregation: A Case Study with Sports Narratives
Hu, Yebowen
Song, Kaiqiang
Cho, Sangwoo
Wang, Xiaoyang
Yao, Wenlin
Foroosh, Hassan
Yu, Dong
Liu, Fei
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Reasoning is most powerful when an LLM accurately aggregates relevant information. We examine the critical role of information aggregation in reasoning by requiring the LLM to analyze sports narratives. To succeed at this task, an LLM must infer points from actions, identify related entities, attribute points accurately to players and teams, and compile key statistics to draw conclusions. We conduct comprehensive experiments with real NBA basketball data and present SportsGen, a new method to synthesize game narratives. By synthesizing data, we can rigorously evaluate LLMs' reasoning capabilities under complex scenarios with varying narrative lengths and density of information. Our findings show that most models, including GPT-4o, often fail to accurately aggregate basketball scores due to frequent scoring patterns. Open-source models like Llama-3 further suffer from significant score hallucinations. Finally, the effectiveness of reasoning is influenced by narrative complexity, information density, and domain-specific terms, highlighting the challenges in analytical reasoning tasks.
title When Reasoning Meets Information Aggregation: A Case Study with Sports Narratives
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12084