Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12784 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908391980400640 |
|---|---|
| author | Wang, Xunzhi Zhang, Zhuowei Chen, Gaonan Li, Qiongyu Luo, Bitong Han, Zhixin Wang, Haotian li, Zhiyu Gao, Hang Hu, Mengting |
| author_facet | Wang, Xunzhi Zhang, Zhuowei Chen, Gaonan Li, Qiongyu Luo, Bitong Han, Zhixin Wang, Haotian li, Zhiyu Gao, Hang Hu, Mengting |
| contents | Despite recent progress in systematic evaluation frameworks, benchmarking the uncertainty of large language models (LLMs) remains a highly challenging task. Existing methods for benchmarking the uncertainty of LLMs face three key challenges: the need for internal model access, additional training, or high computational costs. This is particularly unfavorable for closed-source models. To this end, we introduce UBench, a new benchmark for evaluating the uncertainty of LLMs. Unlike other benchmarks, UBench is based on confidence intervals. It encompasses 11,978 multiple-choice questions spanning knowledge, language, understanding, and reasoning capabilities. Based on this, we conduct extensive experiments. This includes comparisons with other advanced uncertainty estimation methods, the assessment of the uncertainty of 20 LLMs, and an exploration of the effects of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompts, role-playing (RP) prompts, and temperature on model uncertainty. Our analysis reveals several crucial insights: 1) Our confidence interval-based methods are highly effective for uncertainty quantification; 2) Regarding uncertainty, outstanding open-source models show competitive performance versus closed-source models; 3) CoT and RP prompts present potential ways to improve model reliability, while the influence of temperature changes follows no universal rule. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/Cyno2232/UBENCH. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_12784 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | UBench: Benchmarking Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Multiple Choice Questions Wang, Xunzhi Zhang, Zhuowei Chen, Gaonan Li, Qiongyu Luo, Bitong Han, Zhixin Wang, Haotian li, Zhiyu Gao, Hang Hu, Mengting Computation and Language Despite recent progress in systematic evaluation frameworks, benchmarking the uncertainty of large language models (LLMs) remains a highly challenging task. Existing methods for benchmarking the uncertainty of LLMs face three key challenges: the need for internal model access, additional training, or high computational costs. This is particularly unfavorable for closed-source models. To this end, we introduce UBench, a new benchmark for evaluating the uncertainty of LLMs. Unlike other benchmarks, UBench is based on confidence intervals. It encompasses 11,978 multiple-choice questions spanning knowledge, language, understanding, and reasoning capabilities. Based on this, we conduct extensive experiments. This includes comparisons with other advanced uncertainty estimation methods, the assessment of the uncertainty of 20 LLMs, and an exploration of the effects of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompts, role-playing (RP) prompts, and temperature on model uncertainty. Our analysis reveals several crucial insights: 1) Our confidence interval-based methods are highly effective for uncertainty quantification; 2) Regarding uncertainty, outstanding open-source models show competitive performance versus closed-source models; 3) CoT and RP prompts present potential ways to improve model reliability, while the influence of temperature changes follows no universal rule. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/Cyno2232/UBENCH. |
| title | UBench: Benchmarking Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Multiple Choice Questions |
| topic | Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12784 |