Is Peirce's reduction thesis gerrymandered?

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Koshkin, Sergiy
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866914842341801984
author Koshkin, Sergiy
author_facet Koshkin, Sergiy
contents We argue that traditional formulations of the reduction thesis that tie it to privileged relational operations do not suffice for Peirce's justification of the categories, and invite the charge of gerrymandering to make it come out as true. We then develop a more robust invariant formulation of the thesis by explicating the use of triads in any relational operations, which is immune to that charge. The explication also allows us to track how Thirdness enters the structure of higher order relations, and even propose a numerical measure of it. Our analysis reveals new conceptual phenomena when negation or disjunction are used to compound relations.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_14058
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Is Peirce's reduction thesis gerrymandered?
Koshkin, Sergiy
Logic
03G15 03A05 00A30 03E20 03-03
We argue that traditional formulations of the reduction thesis that tie it to privileged relational operations do not suffice for Peirce's justification of the categories, and invite the charge of gerrymandering to make it come out as true. We then develop a more robust invariant formulation of the thesis by explicating the use of triads in any relational operations, which is immune to that charge. The explication also allows us to track how Thirdness enters the structure of higher order relations, and even propose a numerical measure of it. Our analysis reveals new conceptual phenomena when negation or disjunction are used to compound relations.
title Is Peirce's reduction thesis gerrymandered?
topic Logic
03G15 03A05 00A30 03E20 03-03
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14058