Keystroke Dynamics Against Academic Dishonesty in the Age of LLMs
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914844068806656 |
|---|---|
| author | Kundu, Debnath Mehta, Atharva Kumar, Rajesh Lal, Naman Anand, Avinash Singh, Apoorv Shah, Rajiv Ratn |
| author_facet | Kundu, Debnath Mehta, Atharva Kumar, Rajesh Lal, Naman Anand, Avinash Singh, Apoorv Shah, Rajiv Ratn |
| contents | The transition to online examinations and assignments raises significant concerns about academic integrity. Traditional plagiarism detection systems often struggle to identify instances of intelligent cheating, particularly when students utilize advanced generative AI tools to craft their responses. This study proposes a keystroke dynamics-based method to differentiate between bona fide and assisted writing within academic contexts. To facilitate this, a dataset was developed to capture the keystroke patterns of individuals engaged in writing tasks, both with and without the assistance of generative AI. The detector, trained using a modified TypeNet architecture, achieved accuracies ranging from 74.98% to 85.72% in condition-specific scenarios and from 52.24% to 80.54% in condition-agnostic scenarios. The findings highlight significant differences in keystroke dynamics between genuine and assisted writing. The outcomes of this study enhance our understanding of how users interact with generative AI and have implications for improving the reliability of digital educational platforms. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_15335 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Keystroke Dynamics Against Academic Dishonesty in the Age of LLMs Kundu, Debnath Mehta, Atharva Kumar, Rajesh Lal, Naman Anand, Avinash Singh, Apoorv Shah, Rajiv Ratn Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Computers and Society I.5.4 The transition to online examinations and assignments raises significant concerns about academic integrity. Traditional plagiarism detection systems often struggle to identify instances of intelligent cheating, particularly when students utilize advanced generative AI tools to craft their responses. This study proposes a keystroke dynamics-based method to differentiate between bona fide and assisted writing within academic contexts. To facilitate this, a dataset was developed to capture the keystroke patterns of individuals engaged in writing tasks, both with and without the assistance of generative AI. The detector, trained using a modified TypeNet architecture, achieved accuracies ranging from 74.98% to 85.72% in condition-specific scenarios and from 52.24% to 80.54% in condition-agnostic scenarios. The findings highlight significant differences in keystroke dynamics between genuine and assisted writing. The outcomes of this study enhance our understanding of how users interact with generative AI and have implications for improving the reliability of digital educational platforms. |
| title | Keystroke Dynamics Against Academic Dishonesty in the Age of LLMs |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Computers and Society I.5.4 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15335 |