Reply to Comment by K. Forbes on "The super-chirality of vector twisted light" by M. Babiker, J. Yuan, K. Koksal and V. E. Lembessis; Optics Communications 554, 130185 (2024)

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Babiker, M., Yuan, J., Koksal, K., Lembessis, V. E.
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866909229309231104
author Babiker, M.
Yuan, J.
Koksal, K.
Lembessis, V. E.
author_facet Babiker, M.
Yuan, J.
Koksal, K.
Lembessis, V. E.
contents We respond to the recent comment in Optics Communications by Kayn Forbes on our recent Optics Communications article and we maintain that, contrary to what Forbes claims, substantial superchirality exists as a property of the $m\geq 1$ higher order Poincare modes. Forbes arguments are based on misconceptions and analytical errors, leading to erroneous results and unjustified criticism.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_15413
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Reply to Comment by K. Forbes on "The super-chirality of vector twisted light" by M. Babiker, J. Yuan, K. Koksal and V. E. Lembessis; Optics Communications 554, 130185 (2024)
Babiker, M.
Yuan, J.
Koksal, K.
Lembessis, V. E.
Optics
Atomic Physics
We respond to the recent comment in Optics Communications by Kayn Forbes on our recent Optics Communications article and we maintain that, contrary to what Forbes claims, substantial superchirality exists as a property of the $m\geq 1$ higher order Poincare modes. Forbes arguments are based on misconceptions and analytical errors, leading to erroneous results and unjustified criticism.
title Reply to Comment by K. Forbes on "The super-chirality of vector twisted light" by M. Babiker, J. Yuan, K. Koksal and V. E. Lembessis; Optics Communications 554, 130185 (2024)
topic Optics
Atomic Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15413