Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15528 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914844804907008 |
|---|---|
| author | Pommaret, Jean-Francois |
| author_facet | Pommaret, Jean-Francois |
| contents | In the Special Relativity paper of Einstein (1905), only a footnote provides a reference to the conformal group of space-time for the Minkowski metric $ω$. We prove that General Relativity (1915) will depend on the following {\it cornerstone} result of differential homological algebra (1990). Let $K$ be a differential field and $D=K[d_1,...,d_n]$ be the ring of differential operators with coefficients in $K$. If $M$ is the differential module over $D$ defined by the Killing operator ${\cal{D}} :T \rightarrow S_2T^*: ξ\rightarrow Ω= {\cal{L}}(ξ) ω$ and $N$ is the differential module over $D$ defined by the $Cauchy = ad(Killing)$ adjoint operator with torsion submodule $t(N)$, then $t(N) \simeq {ext}^1_D(M) = 0$ and the Cauchy operator can be thus parametrized by stress functions having strictly nothing to do with $Ω$. This result is largely superseding the Kalman controllability test in classical OD control theory and is showing that controllability is a structural "{\it built-in}" property of an OD/PD control system not depending on the choice of inputs and outputs, contrary to the engineering tradition. It also points out the {\it terrible confusion} done by Einstein (1915) while following Beltrami (1892), both of them using the Einstein operator but ignoring that it was self-adjoint in the framework of differential double duality (1995). We finally prove that the structure of electromagnetism and gravitation only depends on the nonlinear {\it elations} of the conformal group of space-time, showing thus that {\it nothing is left from the mathematical foundations of both general relativity and gauge theory}. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_15528 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | From Kalman to Einstein and Maxwell: the Structural Controllability Revisited Pommaret, Jean-Francois Mathematical Physics 13D02, 20F05, 35G35, 83C22, 93B05 In the Special Relativity paper of Einstein (1905), only a footnote provides a reference to the conformal group of space-time for the Minkowski metric $ω$. We prove that General Relativity (1915) will depend on the following {\it cornerstone} result of differential homological algebra (1990). Let $K$ be a differential field and $D=K[d_1,...,d_n]$ be the ring of differential operators with coefficients in $K$. If $M$ is the differential module over $D$ defined by the Killing operator ${\cal{D}} :T \rightarrow S_2T^*: ξ\rightarrow Ω= {\cal{L}}(ξ) ω$ and $N$ is the differential module over $D$ defined by the $Cauchy = ad(Killing)$ adjoint operator with torsion submodule $t(N)$, then $t(N) \simeq {ext}^1_D(M) = 0$ and the Cauchy operator can be thus parametrized by stress functions having strictly nothing to do with $Ω$. This result is largely superseding the Kalman controllability test in classical OD control theory and is showing that controllability is a structural "{\it built-in}" property of an OD/PD control system not depending on the choice of inputs and outputs, contrary to the engineering tradition. It also points out the {\it terrible confusion} done by Einstein (1915) while following Beltrami (1892), both of them using the Einstein operator but ignoring that it was self-adjoint in the framework of differential double duality (1995). We finally prove that the structure of electromagnetism and gravitation only depends on the nonlinear {\it elations} of the conformal group of space-time, showing thus that {\it nothing is left from the mathematical foundations of both general relativity and gauge theory}. |
| title | From Kalman to Einstein and Maxwell: the Structural Controllability Revisited |
| topic | Mathematical Physics 13D02, 20F05, 35G35, 83C22, 93B05 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15528 |