eagerlearners at SemEval2024 Task 5: The Legal Argument Reasoning Task in Civil Procedure

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Sabzevari, Hoorieh, Rostamkhani, Mohammadmostafa, Eetemadi, Sauleh
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866913402704625664
author Sabzevari, Hoorieh
Rostamkhani, Mohammadmostafa
Eetemadi, Sauleh
author_facet Sabzevari, Hoorieh
Rostamkhani, Mohammadmostafa
Eetemadi, Sauleh
contents This study investigates the performance of the zero-shot method in classifying data using three large language models, alongside two models with large input token sizes and the two pre-trained models on legal data. Our main dataset comes from the domain of U.S. civil procedure. It includes summaries of legal cases, specific questions, potential answers, and detailed explanations for why each solution is relevant, all sourced from a book aimed at law students. By comparing different methods, we aimed to understand how effectively they handle the complexities found in legal datasets. Our findings show how well the zero-shot method of large language models can understand complicated data. We achieved our highest F1 score of 64% in these experiments.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_16490
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle eagerlearners at SemEval2024 Task 5: The Legal Argument Reasoning Task in Civil Procedure
Sabzevari, Hoorieh
Rostamkhani, Mohammadmostafa
Eetemadi, Sauleh
Computation and Language
This study investigates the performance of the zero-shot method in classifying data using three large language models, alongside two models with large input token sizes and the two pre-trained models on legal data. Our main dataset comes from the domain of U.S. civil procedure. It includes summaries of legal cases, specific questions, potential answers, and detailed explanations for why each solution is relevant, all sourced from a book aimed at law students. By comparing different methods, we aimed to understand how effectively they handle the complexities found in legal datasets. Our findings show how well the zero-shot method of large language models can understand complicated data. We achieved our highest F1 score of 64% in these experiments.
title eagerlearners at SemEval2024 Task 5: The Legal Argument Reasoning Task in Civil Procedure
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.16490