Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering paradox "2=1'' for $N$ qubits

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Zhi-Jie, Zhou, Jie, Meng, Hui-Xian, Fan, Xing-Yan, Xie, Mi, Zhang, Fu-lin, Chen, Jing-Ling
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866913403565506560
author Liu, Zhi-Jie
Zhou, Jie
Meng, Hui-Xian
Fan, Xing-Yan
Xie, Mi
Zhang, Fu-lin
Chen, Jing-Ling
author_facet Liu, Zhi-Jie
Zhou, Jie
Meng, Hui-Xian
Fan, Xing-Yan
Xie, Mi
Zhang, Fu-lin
Chen, Jing-Ling
contents Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox highlights the absence of a local realistic explanation for quantum mechanics, and shows the incompatibility of the local-hidden-state models with quantum theory. For $N$-qubit states, or more importantly, the $N$-qubit mixed states, we present the EPR steering paradox in the form of the contradictory equality "2=1". We show that the contradiction holds for any $N$-qubit state as long as both the pure state requirement and the measurement requirement are satisfied. This also indicates that the EPR steering paradox exists in more general cases. Finally, we give specific examples to demonstrate and analyze our arguments.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_17247
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering paradox "2=1'' for $N$ qubits
Liu, Zhi-Jie
Zhou, Jie
Meng, Hui-Xian
Fan, Xing-Yan
Xie, Mi
Zhang, Fu-lin
Chen, Jing-Ling
Quantum Physics
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox highlights the absence of a local realistic explanation for quantum mechanics, and shows the incompatibility of the local-hidden-state models with quantum theory. For $N$-qubit states, or more importantly, the $N$-qubit mixed states, we present the EPR steering paradox in the form of the contradictory equality "2=1". We show that the contradiction holds for any $N$-qubit state as long as both the pure state requirement and the measurement requirement are satisfied. This also indicates that the EPR steering paradox exists in more general cases. Finally, we give specific examples to demonstrate and analyze our arguments.
title Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering paradox "2=1'' for $N$ qubits
topic Quantum Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17247