Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Schrouff, Jessica, Bellot, Alexis, Rannen-Triki, Amal, Malek, Alan, Albuquerque, Isabela, Gretton, Arthur, D'Amour, Alexander, Chiappa, Silvia
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17433
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866915602970443776
author Schrouff, Jessica
Bellot, Alexis
Rannen-Triki, Amal
Malek, Alan
Albuquerque, Isabela
Gretton, Arthur
D'Amour, Alexander
Chiappa, Silvia
author_facet Schrouff, Jessica
Bellot, Alexis
Rannen-Triki, Amal
Malek, Alan
Albuquerque, Isabela
Gretton, Arthur
D'Amour, Alexander
Chiappa, Silvia
contents Failures of fairness or robustness in machine learning predictive settings can be due to undesired dependencies between covariates, outcomes and auxiliary factors of variation. A common strategy to mitigate these failures is data balancing, which attempts to remove those undesired dependencies. In this work, we define conditions on the training distribution for data balancing to lead to fair or robust models. Our results display that, in many cases, the balanced distribution does not correspond to selectively removing the undesired dependencies in a causal graph of the task, leading to multiple failure modes and even interference with other mitigation techniques such as regularization. Overall, our results highlight the importance of taking the causal graph into account before performing data balancing.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_17433
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Mind the Graph When Balancing Data for Fairness or Robustness
Schrouff, Jessica
Bellot, Alexis
Rannen-Triki, Amal
Malek, Alan
Albuquerque, Isabela
Gretton, Arthur
D'Amour, Alexander
Chiappa, Silvia
Machine Learning
Failures of fairness or robustness in machine learning predictive settings can be due to undesired dependencies between covariates, outcomes and auxiliary factors of variation. A common strategy to mitigate these failures is data balancing, which attempts to remove those undesired dependencies. In this work, we define conditions on the training distribution for data balancing to lead to fair or robust models. Our results display that, in many cases, the balanced distribution does not correspond to selectively removing the undesired dependencies in a causal graph of the task, leading to multiple failure modes and even interference with other mitigation techniques such as regularization. Overall, our results highlight the importance of taking the causal graph into account before performing data balancing.
title Mind the Graph When Balancing Data for Fairness or Robustness
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17433