CoSafe: Evaluating Large Language Model Safety in Multi-Turn Dialogue Coreference
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866909231219736576 |
|---|---|
| author | Yu, Erxin Li, Jing Liao, Ming Wang, Siqi Gao, Zuchen Mi, Fei Hong, Lanqing |
| author_facet | Yu, Erxin Li, Jing Liao, Ming Wang, Siqi Gao, Zuchen Mi, Fei Hong, Lanqing |
| contents | As large language models (LLMs) constantly evolve, ensuring their safety remains a critical research problem. Previous red-teaming approaches for LLM safety have primarily focused on single prompt attacks or goal hijacking. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to study LLM safety in multi-turn dialogue coreference. We created a dataset of 1,400 questions across 14 categories, each featuring multi-turn coreference safety attacks. We then conducted detailed evaluations on five widely used open-source LLMs. The results indicated that under multi-turn coreference safety attacks, the highest attack success rate was 56% with the LLaMA2-Chat-7b model, while the lowest was 13.9% with the Mistral-7B-Instruct model. These findings highlight the safety vulnerabilities in LLMs during dialogue coreference interactions. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_17626 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | CoSafe: Evaluating Large Language Model Safety in Multi-Turn Dialogue Coreference Yu, Erxin Li, Jing Liao, Ming Wang, Siqi Gao, Zuchen Mi, Fei Hong, Lanqing Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence As large language models (LLMs) constantly evolve, ensuring their safety remains a critical research problem. Previous red-teaming approaches for LLM safety have primarily focused on single prompt attacks or goal hijacking. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to study LLM safety in multi-turn dialogue coreference. We created a dataset of 1,400 questions across 14 categories, each featuring multi-turn coreference safety attacks. We then conducted detailed evaluations on five widely used open-source LLMs. The results indicated that under multi-turn coreference safety attacks, the highest attack success rate was 56% with the LLaMA2-Chat-7b model, while the lowest was 13.9% with the Mistral-7B-Instruct model. These findings highlight the safety vulnerabilities in LLMs during dialogue coreference interactions. |
| title | CoSafe: Evaluating Large Language Model Safety in Multi-Turn Dialogue Coreference |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17626 |