Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.19288 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866918485391572992 |
|---|---|
| author | van Montfort, Loek Dullaert, Wout Leitner, Markus |
| author_facet | van Montfort, Loek Dullaert, Wout Leitner, Markus |
| contents | This paper introduces the concept of task-splitting into home healthcare (HHC) routing and scheduling. It focuses on the design of routes and timetables for caregivers providing services at patients' homes. Task-splitting is the division of a (lengthy) patient visit into separate visits that can be performed by different caregivers at different times. The resulting split parts may have reduced caregiver qualification requirements, relaxed visiting time windows, or a shorter/longer combined duration. However, additional temporal dependencies can arise between them. To incorporate task-splitting decisions into the planning process, we introduce two different mixed integer linear programming formulations, a Miller-Tucker-Zemlin and a time-indexed variant. These formulations aim to minimize operational costs while simultaneously deciding which visits to split and imposing a potentially wide range of temporal dependencies. We also propose pre-processing routines for the time-indexed formulation and two heuristic procedures. These methods are embedded into the branch-and-bound approach as primal and improvement heuristics. The results of our computational study demonstrate the additional computational difficulty introduced by task-splitting possibilities and the associated additional synchronization, and the usefulness of the proposed heuristic procedures. From a planning perspective, our results indicate that integrating task-splitting decisions into the planning process reduces staff requirements, decreases HHC operational costs, and allows caregivers to spend relatively more time on tasks aligned with their qualifications. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_19288 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Task-splitting in home healthcare routing and scheduling van Montfort, Loek Dullaert, Wout Leitner, Markus Optimization and Control This paper introduces the concept of task-splitting into home healthcare (HHC) routing and scheduling. It focuses on the design of routes and timetables for caregivers providing services at patients' homes. Task-splitting is the division of a (lengthy) patient visit into separate visits that can be performed by different caregivers at different times. The resulting split parts may have reduced caregiver qualification requirements, relaxed visiting time windows, or a shorter/longer combined duration. However, additional temporal dependencies can arise between them. To incorporate task-splitting decisions into the planning process, we introduce two different mixed integer linear programming formulations, a Miller-Tucker-Zemlin and a time-indexed variant. These formulations aim to minimize operational costs while simultaneously deciding which visits to split and imposing a potentially wide range of temporal dependencies. We also propose pre-processing routines for the time-indexed formulation and two heuristic procedures. These methods are embedded into the branch-and-bound approach as primal and improvement heuristics. The results of our computational study demonstrate the additional computational difficulty introduced by task-splitting possibilities and the associated additional synchronization, and the usefulness of the proposed heuristic procedures. From a planning perspective, our results indicate that integrating task-splitting decisions into the planning process reduces staff requirements, decreases HHC operational costs, and allows caregivers to spend relatively more time on tasks aligned with their qualifications. |
| title | Task-splitting in home healthcare routing and scheduling |
| topic | Optimization and Control |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.19288 |