What's the Weight? Estimating Controlled Outcome Differences in Complex Surveys for Health Disparities Research

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Salerno, Stephen, Roberts, Emily K., Needham, Belinda L., McCormick, Tyler H., Li, Fan, Mukherjee, Bhramar, Shi, Xu
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915497624207360
author Salerno, Stephen
Roberts, Emily K.
Needham, Belinda L.
McCormick, Tyler H.
Li, Fan
Mukherjee, Bhramar
Shi, Xu
author_facet Salerno, Stephen
Roberts, Emily K.
Needham, Belinda L.
McCormick, Tyler H.
Li, Fan
Mukherjee, Bhramar
Shi, Xu
contents In this work, we are motivated by the problem of estimating racial disparities in health outcomes, specifically the average controlled difference (ACD) in telomere length between Black and White individuals, using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). To do so, we build a propensity for race to properly adjust for other social determinants while characterizing the controlled effect of race on telomere length. Propensity score methods are broadly employed with observational data as a tool to achieve covariate balance, but how to implement them in complex surveys is less studied - in particular, when the survey weights depend on the group variable under comparison (as the NHANES sampling scheme depends on self-reported race). We propose identification formulas to properly estimate the ACD in outcomes between Black and White individuals, with appropriate weighting for both covariate imbalance across the two racial groups and generalizability. Via extensive simulation, we show that our proposed methods outperform traditional analytic approaches in terms of bias, mean squared error, and coverage when estimating the ACD for our setting of interest. In our data, we find that evidence of racial differences in telomere length between Black and White individuals attenuates after accounting for confounding by socioeconomic factors and utilizing appropriate propensity score and survey weighting techniques. Software to implement these methods and code to reproduce our results can be found in the R package svycdiff, available through the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) at cran.r-project.org/web/packages/svycdiff/, or in a development version on GitHub at github.com/salernos/svycdiff.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2406_19597
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle What's the Weight? Estimating Controlled Outcome Differences in Complex Surveys for Health Disparities Research
Salerno, Stephen
Roberts, Emily K.
Needham, Belinda L.
McCormick, Tyler H.
Li, Fan
Mukherjee, Bhramar
Shi, Xu
Methodology
In this work, we are motivated by the problem of estimating racial disparities in health outcomes, specifically the average controlled difference (ACD) in telomere length between Black and White individuals, using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). To do so, we build a propensity for race to properly adjust for other social determinants while characterizing the controlled effect of race on telomere length. Propensity score methods are broadly employed with observational data as a tool to achieve covariate balance, but how to implement them in complex surveys is less studied - in particular, when the survey weights depend on the group variable under comparison (as the NHANES sampling scheme depends on self-reported race). We propose identification formulas to properly estimate the ACD in outcomes between Black and White individuals, with appropriate weighting for both covariate imbalance across the two racial groups and generalizability. Via extensive simulation, we show that our proposed methods outperform traditional analytic approaches in terms of bias, mean squared error, and coverage when estimating the ACD for our setting of interest. In our data, we find that evidence of racial differences in telomere length between Black and White individuals attenuates after accounting for confounding by socioeconomic factors and utilizing appropriate propensity score and survey weighting techniques. Software to implement these methods and code to reproduce our results can be found in the R package svycdiff, available through the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) at cran.r-project.org/web/packages/svycdiff/, or in a development version on GitHub at github.com/salernos/svycdiff.
title What's the Weight? Estimating Controlled Outcome Differences in Complex Surveys for Health Disparities Research
topic Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.19597