Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McClure, Jeanne, Shimmei, Machi, Matsuda, Noboru, Jiang, Shiyan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01551
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909238054354944
author McClure, Jeanne
Shimmei, Machi
Matsuda, Noboru
Jiang, Shiyan
author_facet McClure, Jeanne
Shimmei, Machi
Matsuda, Noboru
Jiang, Shiyan
contents In this paper, we explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) with assertions to mitigate imbalances in educational datasets. Traditional models often fall short in such contexts, particularly due to the complexity and nuanced nature of the data. This issue is especially prominent in the education sector, where cognitive engagement levels among students show significant variation in their open responses. To test our hypothesis, we utilized an existing technology for assertion-based prompt engineering through an 'Iterative - ICL PE Design Process' comparing traditional Machine Learning (ML) models against LLMs augmented with assertions (N=135). Further, we conduct a sensitivity analysis on a subset (n=27), examining the variance in model performance concerning classification metrics and cognitive engagement levels in each iteration. Our findings reveal that LLMs with assertions significantly outperform traditional ML models, particularly in cognitive engagement levels with minority representation, registering up to a 32% increase in F1-score. Additionally, our sensitivity study indicates that incorporating targeted assertions into the LLM tested on the subset enhances its performance by 11.94%. This improvement primarily addresses errors stemming from the model's limitations in understanding context and resolving lexical ambiguities in student responses.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_01551
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Leveraging Prompts in LLMs to Overcome Imbalances in Complex Educational Text Data
McClure, Jeanne
Shimmei, Machi
Matsuda, Noboru
Jiang, Shiyan
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
In this paper, we explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) with assertions to mitigate imbalances in educational datasets. Traditional models often fall short in such contexts, particularly due to the complexity and nuanced nature of the data. This issue is especially prominent in the education sector, where cognitive engagement levels among students show significant variation in their open responses. To test our hypothesis, we utilized an existing technology for assertion-based prompt engineering through an 'Iterative - ICL PE Design Process' comparing traditional Machine Learning (ML) models against LLMs augmented with assertions (N=135). Further, we conduct a sensitivity analysis on a subset (n=27), examining the variance in model performance concerning classification metrics and cognitive engagement levels in each iteration. Our findings reveal that LLMs with assertions significantly outperform traditional ML models, particularly in cognitive engagement levels with minority representation, registering up to a 32% increase in F1-score. Additionally, our sensitivity study indicates that incorporating targeted assertions into the LLM tested on the subset enhances its performance by 11.94%. This improvement primarily addresses errors stemming from the model's limitations in understanding context and resolving lexical ambiguities in student responses.
title Leveraging Prompts in LLMs to Overcome Imbalances in Complex Educational Text Data
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01551