What Should Be Considered to Support well-being with AI: Considerations Based on Responsible Research and Innovation
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866909626715340800 |
|---|---|
| author | Nakao, Yuri |
| author_facet | Nakao, Yuri |
| contents | To achieve people's well-being with AI systems, we should enable each user to be guided to a healthier lifestyle in a way that is appropriate for her or him. However, there is a dilemma between general well-being as defined in academic and medical discussions and the autonomy users should have when deciding how to promote their well-being. In this position paper, we discuss the difficulty for AI application developers to fully consider in the design phase what might happen to the user, taking an example of a running application (app). We sort out the required factors to enable AI apps that support well-being to address the dilemma between unilaterally defined well-being and human autonomy based on the four dimensions required for responsible innovation: inclusion, anticipation, reflexivity, and responsiveness. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_02381 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | What Should Be Considered to Support well-being with AI: Considerations Based on Responsible Research and Innovation Nakao, Yuri Human-Computer Interaction To achieve people's well-being with AI systems, we should enable each user to be guided to a healthier lifestyle in a way that is appropriate for her or him. However, there is a dilemma between general well-being as defined in academic and medical discussions and the autonomy users should have when deciding how to promote their well-being. In this position paper, we discuss the difficulty for AI application developers to fully consider in the design phase what might happen to the user, taking an example of a running application (app). We sort out the required factors to enable AI apps that support well-being to address the dilemma between unilaterally defined well-being and human autonomy based on the four dimensions required for responsible innovation: inclusion, anticipation, reflexivity, and responsiveness. |
| title | What Should Be Considered to Support well-being with AI: Considerations Based on Responsible Research and Innovation |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02381 |