Should zeros count? Modeling the galaxy-globular cluster scaling relation with(out) zero-inflated count models

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Berek, Samantha C., Eadie, Gwendolyn M., Speagle, Joshua S., Wang, Shu Yan
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866914859872944128
author Berek, Samantha C.
Eadie, Gwendolyn M.
Speagle, Joshua S.
Wang, Shu Yan
author_facet Berek, Samantha C.
Eadie, Gwendolyn M.
Speagle, Joshua S.
Wang, Shu Yan
contents The scaling relation between the size of a galaxy's globular cluster (GC) population ($N_{GC}$) and the galaxy's stellar mass ($M_*$) is usually described with a continuous, linear model, but in reality it is a count relationship that should be modeled as such. For massive galaxies, a negative binomial (NB) model has been shown to describe the data well, but it is unclear how the scaling relation behaves at low galaxy masses where a substantial portion of galaxies have $N_{GC}=0$. In this work, we test the utility of Poisson and NB models for describing the low-mass end of the $N_{GC}-M_*$ scaling relation. We introduce the use of zero-inflated versions of these models, which allow for larger zero populations (e.g. galaxies without GCs) than would otherwise be predicted. We evaluate our models with a variety of predictive model comparison methods, including predictive intervals, leave-one-out cross-validation criterion, and posterior predictive comparisons. We find that the NB model is consistent with our data, but the naive Poisson is not. Moreover, we find that zero inflation of the models is not necessary to describe the population of low-mass galaxies that lack GCs, suggesting that a single formation and evolutionary process acts over all galaxy masses. Under the NB model, there does not appear to be anything unique about the lack of GCs in many low-mass galaxies; they are simply the low-mass extension of the larger $N_{GC}-M_*$ scaling relation.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_04764
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Should zeros count? Modeling the galaxy-globular cluster scaling relation with(out) zero-inflated count models
Berek, Samantha C.
Eadie, Gwendolyn M.
Speagle, Joshua S.
Wang, Shu Yan
Astrophysics of Galaxies
The scaling relation between the size of a galaxy's globular cluster (GC) population ($N_{GC}$) and the galaxy's stellar mass ($M_*$) is usually described with a continuous, linear model, but in reality it is a count relationship that should be modeled as such. For massive galaxies, a negative binomial (NB) model has been shown to describe the data well, but it is unclear how the scaling relation behaves at low galaxy masses where a substantial portion of galaxies have $N_{GC}=0$. In this work, we test the utility of Poisson and NB models for describing the low-mass end of the $N_{GC}-M_*$ scaling relation. We introduce the use of zero-inflated versions of these models, which allow for larger zero populations (e.g. galaxies without GCs) than would otherwise be predicted. We evaluate our models with a variety of predictive model comparison methods, including predictive intervals, leave-one-out cross-validation criterion, and posterior predictive comparisons. We find that the NB model is consistent with our data, but the naive Poisson is not. Moreover, we find that zero inflation of the models is not necessary to describe the population of low-mass galaxies that lack GCs, suggesting that a single formation and evolutionary process acts over all galaxy masses. Under the NB model, there does not appear to be anything unique about the lack of GCs in many low-mass galaxies; they are simply the low-mass extension of the larger $N_{GC}-M_*$ scaling relation.
title Should zeros count? Modeling the galaxy-globular cluster scaling relation with(out) zero-inflated count models
topic Astrophysics of Galaxies
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04764