Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05758 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866929413572001792 |
|---|---|
| author | Zhang, Yutong Pan, Yi Zhong, Tianyang Dong, Peixin Xie, Kangni Liu, Yuxiao Jiang, Hanqi Liu, Zhengliang Zhao, Shijie Zhang, Tuo Jiang, Xi Shen, Dinggang Liu, Tianming Zhang, Xin |
| author_facet | Zhang, Yutong Pan, Yi Zhong, Tianyang Dong, Peixin Xie, Kangni Liu, Yuxiao Jiang, Hanqi Liu, Zhengliang Zhao, Shijie Zhang, Tuo Jiang, Xi Shen, Dinggang Liu, Tianming Zhang, Xin |
| contents | Medical images and radiology reports are crucial for diagnosing medical conditions, highlighting the importance of quantitative analysis for clinical decision-making. However, the diversity and cross-source heterogeneity of these data challenge the generalizability of current data-mining methods. Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently transformed many domains, significantly affecting the medical field. Notably, Gemini-Vision-series (Gemini) and GPT-4-series (GPT-4) models have epitomized a paradigm shift in Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) for computer vision, showcasing their potential in the biomedical domain. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Gemini, GPT-4, and 4 popular large models for an exhaustive evaluation across 14 medical imaging datasets, including 5 medical imaging categories (dermatology, radiology, dentistry, ophthalmology, and endoscopy), and 3 radiology report datasets. The investigated tasks encompass disease classification, lesion segmentation, anatomical localization, disease diagnosis, report generation, and lesion detection. Our experimental results demonstrated that Gemini-series models excelled in report generation and lesion detection but faces challenges in disease classification and anatomical localization. Conversely, GPT-series models exhibited proficiency in lesion segmentation and anatomical localization but encountered difficulties in disease diagnosis and lesion detection. Additionally, both the Gemini series and GPT series contain models that have demonstrated commendable generation efficiency. While both models hold promise in reducing physician workload, alleviating pressure on limited healthcare resources, and fostering collaboration between clinical practitioners and artificial intelligence technologies, substantial enhancements and comprehensive validations remain imperative before clinical deployment. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_05758 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Potential of Multimodal Large Language Models for Data Mining of Medical Images and Free-text Reports Zhang, Yutong Pan, Yi Zhong, Tianyang Dong, Peixin Xie, Kangni Liu, Yuxiao Jiang, Hanqi Liu, Zhengliang Zhao, Shijie Zhang, Tuo Jiang, Xi Shen, Dinggang Liu, Tianming Zhang, Xin Image and Video Processing Artificial Intelligence Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Medical images and radiology reports are crucial for diagnosing medical conditions, highlighting the importance of quantitative analysis for clinical decision-making. However, the diversity and cross-source heterogeneity of these data challenge the generalizability of current data-mining methods. Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently transformed many domains, significantly affecting the medical field. Notably, Gemini-Vision-series (Gemini) and GPT-4-series (GPT-4) models have epitomized a paradigm shift in Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) for computer vision, showcasing their potential in the biomedical domain. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Gemini, GPT-4, and 4 popular large models for an exhaustive evaluation across 14 medical imaging datasets, including 5 medical imaging categories (dermatology, radiology, dentistry, ophthalmology, and endoscopy), and 3 radiology report datasets. The investigated tasks encompass disease classification, lesion segmentation, anatomical localization, disease diagnosis, report generation, and lesion detection. Our experimental results demonstrated that Gemini-series models excelled in report generation and lesion detection but faces challenges in disease classification and anatomical localization. Conversely, GPT-series models exhibited proficiency in lesion segmentation and anatomical localization but encountered difficulties in disease diagnosis and lesion detection. Additionally, both the Gemini series and GPT series contain models that have demonstrated commendable generation efficiency. While both models hold promise in reducing physician workload, alleviating pressure on limited healthcare resources, and fostering collaboration between clinical practitioners and artificial intelligence technologies, substantial enhancements and comprehensive validations remain imperative before clinical deployment. |
| title | Potential of Multimodal Large Language Models for Data Mining of Medical Images and Free-text Reports |
| topic | Image and Video Processing Artificial Intelligence Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05758 |