Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Yan, Guanao, Li, Jingyi Jessica, Biggin, Mark D.
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07420
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866917719936335872
author Yan, Guanao
Li, Jingyi Jessica
Biggin, Mark D.
author_facet Yan, Guanao
Li, Jingyi Jessica
Biggin, Mark D.
contents Collusion between students in online exams is a major problem that undermines the integrity of the exam results. Although there exist methods that use exam data to identify pairs of students who have likely copied each other's answers, these methods are restricted to specific formats of multiple-choice exams. Here we present a statistical algorithm, Q-SID, that efficiently detects groups of students who likely have colluded, i.e., collusion groups, with error quantification. Q-SID uses graded numeric question scores only, so it works for many formats of multiple-choice and non-multiple-choice exams. Q-SID reports two false-positive rates (FPRs) for each collusion group: (1) empirical FPR, whose null data are from 36 strictly proctored exam datasets independent of the user-input exam data and (2) synthetic FPR, whose null data are simulated from a copula-based probabilistic model, which is first fitted to the user-input exam data and then modified to have no collusion. On 34 unproctored exam datasets, including two benchmark datasets with true positives and negatives verified by textural analysis, we demonstrate that Q-SID is a collusion detection algorithm with powerful and robust performance across exam formats, numbers of questions and students, and exam complexity.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_07420
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Question-Score Identity Detection (Q-SID): A Statistical Algorithm to Detect Collusion Groups with Error Quantification from Exam Question Scores
Yan, Guanao
Li, Jingyi Jessica
Biggin, Mark D.
Applications
Collusion between students in online exams is a major problem that undermines the integrity of the exam results. Although there exist methods that use exam data to identify pairs of students who have likely copied each other's answers, these methods are restricted to specific formats of multiple-choice exams. Here we present a statistical algorithm, Q-SID, that efficiently detects groups of students who likely have colluded, i.e., collusion groups, with error quantification. Q-SID uses graded numeric question scores only, so it works for many formats of multiple-choice and non-multiple-choice exams. Q-SID reports two false-positive rates (FPRs) for each collusion group: (1) empirical FPR, whose null data are from 36 strictly proctored exam datasets independent of the user-input exam data and (2) synthetic FPR, whose null data are simulated from a copula-based probabilistic model, which is first fitted to the user-input exam data and then modified to have no collusion. On 34 unproctored exam datasets, including two benchmark datasets with true positives and negatives verified by textural analysis, we demonstrate that Q-SID is a collusion detection algorithm with powerful and robust performance across exam formats, numbers of questions and students, and exam complexity.
title Question-Score Identity Detection (Q-SID): A Statistical Algorithm to Detect Collusion Groups with Error Quantification from Exam Question Scores
topic Applications
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07420