On the Problem of Defining Charge Operators for the Dirac Quantum Field

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Rico, Pablo Costa, Tumulka, Roderich
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866913428509032448
author Rico, Pablo Costa
Tumulka, Roderich
author_facet Rico, Pablo Costa
Tumulka, Roderich
contents It is well known how to define the operator $Q$ for the total charge (i.e., positron number minus electron number) on the standard Hilbert space of the second-quantized Dirac equation. Here we ask about operators $Q_A$ representing the charge content of a region $A\subseteq \mathbb{R}^3$ in 3d physical space. There is a natural formula for $Q_A$ but, as we explain, there are difficulties about turning it into a mathematically precise definition. First, $Q_A$ can be written as a series but its convergence seems hopeless. Second, we show for some choices of $A$ that if $Q_A$ could be defined then its domain could not contain either the vacuum vector or any vector obtained from the vacuum by applying a polynomial in creation and annihilation operators. Both observations speak against the existence of $Q_A$ for generic $A$.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_09126
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle On the Problem of Defining Charge Operators for the Dirac Quantum Field
Rico, Pablo Costa
Tumulka, Roderich
Mathematical Physics
Quantum Physics
It is well known how to define the operator $Q$ for the total charge (i.e., positron number minus electron number) on the standard Hilbert space of the second-quantized Dirac equation. Here we ask about operators $Q_A$ representing the charge content of a region $A\subseteq \mathbb{R}^3$ in 3d physical space. There is a natural formula for $Q_A$ but, as we explain, there are difficulties about turning it into a mathematically precise definition. First, $Q_A$ can be written as a series but its convergence seems hopeless. Second, we show for some choices of $A$ that if $Q_A$ could be defined then its domain could not contain either the vacuum vector or any vector obtained from the vacuum by applying a polynomial in creation and annihilation operators. Both observations speak against the existence of $Q_A$ for generic $A$.
title On the Problem of Defining Charge Operators for the Dirac Quantum Field
topic Mathematical Physics
Quantum Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09126