Robustness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Industrial Process Modelling
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913528729829376 |
|---|---|
| author | Kantz, Benedikt Staudinger, Clemens Feilmayr, Christoph Wachlmayr, Johannes Haberl, Alexander Schuster, Stefan Pernkopf, Franz |
| author_facet | Kantz, Benedikt Staudinger, Clemens Feilmayr, Christoph Wachlmayr, Johannes Haberl, Alexander Schuster, Stefan Pernkopf, Franz |
| contents | eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims at providing understandable explanations of black box models. In this paper, we evaluate current XAI methods by scoring them based on ground truth simulations and sensitivity analysis. To this end, we used an Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) model to better understand the limits and robustness characteristics of XAI methods such as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), as well as Averaged Local Effects (ALE) or Smooth Gradients (SG) in a highly topical setting. These XAI methods were applied to various types of black-box models and then scored based on their correctness compared to the ground-truth sensitivity of the data-generating processes using a novel scoring evaluation methodology over a range of simulated additive noise. The resulting evaluation shows that the capability of the Machine Learning (ML) models to capture the process accurately is, indeed, coupled with the correctness of the explainability of the underlying data-generating process. We furthermore show the differences between XAI methods in their ability to correctly predict the true sensitivity of the modeled industrial process. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_09127 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Robustness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Industrial Process Modelling Kantz, Benedikt Staudinger, Clemens Feilmayr, Christoph Wachlmayr, Johannes Haberl, Alexander Schuster, Stefan Pernkopf, Franz Machine Learning eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims at providing understandable explanations of black box models. In this paper, we evaluate current XAI methods by scoring them based on ground truth simulations and sensitivity analysis. To this end, we used an Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) model to better understand the limits and robustness characteristics of XAI methods such as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), as well as Averaged Local Effects (ALE) or Smooth Gradients (SG) in a highly topical setting. These XAI methods were applied to various types of black-box models and then scored based on their correctness compared to the ground-truth sensitivity of the data-generating processes using a novel scoring evaluation methodology over a range of simulated additive noise. The resulting evaluation shows that the capability of the Machine Learning (ML) models to capture the process accurately is, indeed, coupled with the correctness of the explainability of the underlying data-generating process. We furthermore show the differences between XAI methods in their ability to correctly predict the true sensitivity of the modeled industrial process. |
| title | Robustness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Industrial Process Modelling |
| topic | Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09127 |