Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Macrae, Roderick M.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09568
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911954834030592
author Macrae, Roderick M.
author_facet Macrae, Roderick M.
contents In a recent Note (Am. J. Phys. 92:397, 2024; arXiv:2309.10826), Vallejo and Bove provide a physical argument based nominally on the second law of thermodynamics as a way of resolving the mathematical question appearing in the title. A remarkable aspect of their argument is that it does not depend on the numerical value of $π$, because $e^{x} \ge x^{e}$ for all positive $x$, with equality occurring only when $x = e$. Moreover, their argument does not depend on the validity of the second law but is rather a limited proof of it for this particular case.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_09568
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Comment on "Which is greater: $e^π$ or $π^{e}$? An unorthodox physical solution to a classic puzzle"
Macrae, Roderick M.
Classical Physics
In a recent Note (Am. J. Phys. 92:397, 2024; arXiv:2309.10826), Vallejo and Bove provide a physical argument based nominally on the second law of thermodynamics as a way of resolving the mathematical question appearing in the title. A remarkable aspect of their argument is that it does not depend on the numerical value of $π$, because $e^{x} \ge x^{e}$ for all positive $x$, with equality occurring only when $x = e$. Moreover, their argument does not depend on the validity of the second law but is rather a limited proof of it for this particular case.
title Comment on "Which is greater: $e^π$ or $π^{e}$? An unorthodox physical solution to a classic puzzle"
topic Classical Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09568