Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jammal, Mouin, Saab, Antoine, Khalil, Cynthia Abi, Mourad, Charbel, Tsopra, Rosy, Saikali, Melody, Lamy, Jean-Baptiste
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11205
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911956746633216
author Jammal, Mouin
Saab, Antoine
Khalil, Cynthia Abi
Mourad, Charbel
Tsopra, Rosy
Saikali, Melody
Lamy, Jean-Baptiste
author_facet Jammal, Mouin
Saab, Antoine
Khalil, Cynthia Abi
Mourad, Charbel
Tsopra, Rosy
Saikali, Melody
Lamy, Jean-Baptiste
contents Background: The adherence of clinicians to clinical practice guidelines is known to be low, including for the management of COVID-19, due to their difficult use at the point of care and their complexity. Clinical decision support systems have been proposed to implement guidelines and improve adherence. One approach is to permit the navigation inside the recommendations, presented as a decision tree, but the size of the tree often limits this approach and may cause erroneous navigation, especially when it does not fit in a single screen. Methods: We proposed an innovative visual interface to allow clinicians easily navigating inside decision trees for the management of COVID-19 patients. It associates a multi-path tree model with the use of the fisheye visual technique, allowing the visualization of large decision trees in a single screen. To evaluate the impact of this tool on guideline adherence, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in a near-real simulation setting, comparing the decisions taken by medical students using Orient-COVID with those taken with paper guidelines or without guidance, when performing on six realistic clinical cases. Results: The results show that paper guidelines had no impact (p=0.97), while Orient-COVID significantly improved the guideline adherence compared to both other groups (p<0.0003). A significant impact of Orient-COVID was identified on several key points during the management of COVID-19: ordering troponin lab tests, prescribing anticoagulant and oxygen therapy. A multifactor analysis showed no difference between male and female participants. Conclusions: The use of an interactive decision tree for the management of COVID-19 significantly improved the clinician adherence to guidelines. Future works will focus on the integration of the system to electronic health records and on the adaptation of the system to other clinical conditions.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_11205
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Impact on clinical guideline adherence of Orient-COVID, a CDSS based on dynamic medical decision trees for COVID19 management: a randomized simulation trial
Jammal, Mouin
Saab, Antoine
Khalil, Cynthia Abi
Mourad, Charbel
Tsopra, Rosy
Saikali, Melody
Lamy, Jean-Baptiste
Human-Computer Interaction
Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
92C50 (Primary), 68U35 (Secondary)
Background: The adherence of clinicians to clinical practice guidelines is known to be low, including for the management of COVID-19, due to their difficult use at the point of care and their complexity. Clinical decision support systems have been proposed to implement guidelines and improve adherence. One approach is to permit the navigation inside the recommendations, presented as a decision tree, but the size of the tree often limits this approach and may cause erroneous navigation, especially when it does not fit in a single screen. Methods: We proposed an innovative visual interface to allow clinicians easily navigating inside decision trees for the management of COVID-19 patients. It associates a multi-path tree model with the use of the fisheye visual technique, allowing the visualization of large decision trees in a single screen. To evaluate the impact of this tool on guideline adherence, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in a near-real simulation setting, comparing the decisions taken by medical students using Orient-COVID with those taken with paper guidelines or without guidance, when performing on six realistic clinical cases. Results: The results show that paper guidelines had no impact (p=0.97), while Orient-COVID significantly improved the guideline adherence compared to both other groups (p<0.0003). A significant impact of Orient-COVID was identified on several key points during the management of COVID-19: ordering troponin lab tests, prescribing anticoagulant and oxygen therapy. A multifactor analysis showed no difference between male and female participants. Conclusions: The use of an interactive decision tree for the management of COVID-19 significantly improved the clinician adherence to guidelines. Future works will focus on the integration of the system to electronic health records and on the adaptation of the system to other clinical conditions.
title Impact on clinical guideline adherence of Orient-COVID, a CDSS based on dynamic medical decision trees for COVID19 management: a randomized simulation trial
topic Human-Computer Interaction
Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
92C50 (Primary), 68U35 (Secondary)
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11205