Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gong, Haisong, Ma, Huanhuan, Liu, Qiang, Wu, Shu, Wang, Liang
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12425
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866929424341925888
author Gong, Haisong
Ma, Huanhuan
Liu, Qiang
Wu, Shu
Wang, Liang
author_facet Gong, Haisong
Ma, Huanhuan
Liu, Qiang
Wu, Shu
Wang, Liang
contents Claim verification is a task that involves assessing the truthfulness of a given claim based on multiple evidence pieces. Using large language models (LLMs) for claim verification is a promising way. However, simply feeding all the evidence pieces to an LLM and asking if the claim is factual does not yield good results. The challenge lies in the noisy nature of both the evidence and the claim: evidence passages typically contain irrelevant information, with the key facts hidden within the context, while claims often convey multiple aspects simultaneously. To navigate this "noisy crowd" of information, we propose EACon (Evidence Abstraction and Claim Deconstruction), a framework designed to find key information within evidence and verify each aspect of a claim separately. EACon first finds keywords from the claim and employs fuzzy matching to select relevant keywords for each raw evidence piece. These keywords serve as a guide to extract and summarize critical information into abstracted evidence. Subsequently, EACon deconstructs the original claim into subclaims, which are then verified against both abstracted and raw evidence individually. We evaluate EACon using two open-source LLMs on two challenging datasets. Results demonstrate that EACon consistently and substantially improve LLMs' performance in claim verification.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_12425
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Navigating the Noisy Crowd: Finding Key Information for Claim Verification
Gong, Haisong
Ma, Huanhuan
Liu, Qiang
Wu, Shu
Wang, Liang
Computation and Language
Claim verification is a task that involves assessing the truthfulness of a given claim based on multiple evidence pieces. Using large language models (LLMs) for claim verification is a promising way. However, simply feeding all the evidence pieces to an LLM and asking if the claim is factual does not yield good results. The challenge lies in the noisy nature of both the evidence and the claim: evidence passages typically contain irrelevant information, with the key facts hidden within the context, while claims often convey multiple aspects simultaneously. To navigate this "noisy crowd" of information, we propose EACon (Evidence Abstraction and Claim Deconstruction), a framework designed to find key information within evidence and verify each aspect of a claim separately. EACon first finds keywords from the claim and employs fuzzy matching to select relevant keywords for each raw evidence piece. These keywords serve as a guide to extract and summarize critical information into abstracted evidence. Subsequently, EACon deconstructs the original claim into subclaims, which are then verified against both abstracted and raw evidence individually. We evaluate EACon using two open-source LLMs on two challenging datasets. Results demonstrate that EACon consistently and substantially improve LLMs' performance in claim verification.
title Navigating the Noisy Crowd: Finding Key Information for Claim Verification
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12425