Comments concerning the paper "On the calibration of ultra-high energy EASs at the Yakutsk array and Telescope Array" by A.V.Glushkov et. al
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2024
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866910532035936256 |
|---|---|
| author | Matthews, John N. Tsunesada, Yoshiki |
| author_facet | Matthews, John N. Tsunesada, Yoshiki |
| contents | In a recent review of a paper by the Yakutsk Group, submitted to the Journal Physics of Atomic Nuclei and arXiv, the energy scales of the Yakutsk and Telescope Array (TA) experiments were examined. The authors developed a custom detector response simulator incorporating ionization, bremsstrahlung, pair production, and Compton scattering. Applying this simulator to both Yakutsk and TA surface detectors, they concluded that the TA energy scale might be incorrect due to a misdefined ``response unit.'' They referenced the TA's ``energy deposit formula'' from the literature, scaling it by two factors attributed to the thickness and density of the TA scintillator. Their simulations, using the QGSJET-II-04 hadronic interaction model, agreed with TA's calculations for vertical showers but not for inclined showers, suggesting an incorrect VEM unit of 2.05 MeV. However, this conclusion was found to be incorrect. The TA's energy deposit formula, derived from detailed Monte Carlo simulations using GEANT4, accurately represents the most probable energy deposit by a charged particle in the TA scintillator. The value of 2.05 MeV accounts for the scintillator's thickness and density and is validated by excellent agreement between TA's simulated and observed data. The Yakutsk Group's misinterpretation and incorrect application of the TA formula led to their erroneous conclusion. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_12892 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Comments concerning the paper "On the calibration of ultra-high energy EASs at the Yakutsk array and Telescope Array" by A.V.Glushkov et. al Matthews, John N. Tsunesada, Yoshiki High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena In a recent review of a paper by the Yakutsk Group, submitted to the Journal Physics of Atomic Nuclei and arXiv, the energy scales of the Yakutsk and Telescope Array (TA) experiments were examined. The authors developed a custom detector response simulator incorporating ionization, bremsstrahlung, pair production, and Compton scattering. Applying this simulator to both Yakutsk and TA surface detectors, they concluded that the TA energy scale might be incorrect due to a misdefined ``response unit.'' They referenced the TA's ``energy deposit formula'' from the literature, scaling it by two factors attributed to the thickness and density of the TA scintillator. Their simulations, using the QGSJET-II-04 hadronic interaction model, agreed with TA's calculations for vertical showers but not for inclined showers, suggesting an incorrect VEM unit of 2.05 MeV. However, this conclusion was found to be incorrect. The TA's energy deposit formula, derived from detailed Monte Carlo simulations using GEANT4, accurately represents the most probable energy deposit by a charged particle in the TA scintillator. The value of 2.05 MeV accounts for the scintillator's thickness and density and is validated by excellent agreement between TA's simulated and observed data. The Yakutsk Group's misinterpretation and incorrect application of the TA formula led to their erroneous conclusion. |
| title | Comments concerning the paper "On the calibration of ultra-high energy EASs at the Yakutsk array and Telescope Array" by A.V.Glushkov et. al |
| topic | High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12892 |