Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916328799993856 |
|---|---|
| author | Christodorescu, Mihai Craven, Ryan Feizi, Soheil Gong, Neil Hoffmann, Mia Jha, Somesh Jiang, Zhengyuan Kamarposhti, Mehrdad Saberi Mitchell, John Newman, Jessica Probasco, Emelia Qi, Yanjun Shams, Khawaja Turek, Matthew |
| author_facet | Christodorescu, Mihai Craven, Ryan Feizi, Soheil Gong, Neil Hoffmann, Mia Jha, Somesh Jiang, Zhengyuan Kamarposhti, Mehrdad Saberi Mitchell, John Newman, Jessica Probasco, Emelia Qi, Yanjun Shams, Khawaja Turek, Matthew |
| contents | The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) brings about transformative potential across sectors, but its dual-use nature also amplifies risks. Governments globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing innovation against safety. China, the United States (US), and the European Union (EU) are at the forefront with initiatives like the Management of Algorithmic Recommendations, the Executive Order, and the AI Act, respectively. However, the rapid evolution of GenAI capabilities often outpaces the development of comprehensive safety measures, creating a gap between regulatory needs and technical advancements.
A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison (UW-Madison), and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI policy and technology. The diverse stakeholders of the GenAI space -- from the public and governments to academia and industry -- make any safety measures under consideration more complex, as both technical feasibility and regulatory guidance must be realized. This paper summarizes the discussions during the workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed without hindering technological progress? How technology can evolve to meet regulatory standards? The interplay between legislation and technology is a very vast topic, and we don't claim that this paper is a comprehensive treatment on this topic. This paper is meant to capture findings based on the workshop, and hopefully, can guide discussion on this topic. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_12999 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology Christodorescu, Mihai Craven, Ryan Feizi, Soheil Gong, Neil Hoffmann, Mia Jha, Somesh Jiang, Zhengyuan Kamarposhti, Mehrdad Saberi Mitchell, John Newman, Jessica Probasco, Emelia Qi, Yanjun Shams, Khawaja Turek, Matthew Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Cryptography and Security The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) brings about transformative potential across sectors, but its dual-use nature also amplifies risks. Governments globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing innovation against safety. China, the United States (US), and the European Union (EU) are at the forefront with initiatives like the Management of Algorithmic Recommendations, the Executive Order, and the AI Act, respectively. However, the rapid evolution of GenAI capabilities often outpaces the development of comprehensive safety measures, creating a gap between regulatory needs and technical advancements. A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison (UW-Madison), and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI policy and technology. The diverse stakeholders of the GenAI space -- from the public and governments to academia and industry -- make any safety measures under consideration more complex, as both technical feasibility and regulatory guidance must be realized. This paper summarizes the discussions during the workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed without hindering technological progress? How technology can evolve to meet regulatory standards? The interplay between legislation and technology is a very vast topic, and we don't claim that this paper is a comprehensive treatment on this topic. This paper is meant to capture findings based on the workshop, and hopefully, can guide discussion on this topic. |
| title | Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology |
| topic | Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Cryptography and Security |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12999 |