Attention in SRAM on Tenstorrent Grayskull

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thüning, Moritz
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910534989774848
author Thüning, Moritz
author_facet Thüning, Moritz
contents When implementations of the Transformer's self-attention layer utilize SRAM instead of DRAM, they can achieve significant speedups. The Tenstorrent Grayskull architecture provides a large SRAM, distributed across a grid of cores. This work presents a fused kernel for Grayskull, that exclusively utilizes its large SRAM by combining matrix multiplication, attention score scaling and Softmax operations. Additionally, a dedicated Softmax kernel utilizing the SRAM and a CPU implementation serving as a baseline are presented. The Softmax operation consumes most of the runtime in the computation of attention weights from queries and keys on Grayskull. The speedup of the dedicated Softmax kernel compared to the CPU implementation is up to $10 \times$, and the Softmax implementation inside the fused kernel is approximately $1.8 \times$ faster than the dedicated Softmax kernel. The time and memory complexity of all implementations is quadratic in sequence length. Currently, the Grayskull e150 is approximately $30 \times$ cheaper for the general public than an Nvidia H100 PCIe (a state-of-the-art GPU) and offers approximately $1.5 \times$ more SRAM.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_13885
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Attention in SRAM on Tenstorrent Grayskull
Thüning, Moritz
Machine Learning
Performance
I.2.6
When implementations of the Transformer's self-attention layer utilize SRAM instead of DRAM, they can achieve significant speedups. The Tenstorrent Grayskull architecture provides a large SRAM, distributed across a grid of cores. This work presents a fused kernel for Grayskull, that exclusively utilizes its large SRAM by combining matrix multiplication, attention score scaling and Softmax operations. Additionally, a dedicated Softmax kernel utilizing the SRAM and a CPU implementation serving as a baseline are presented. The Softmax operation consumes most of the runtime in the computation of attention weights from queries and keys on Grayskull. The speedup of the dedicated Softmax kernel compared to the CPU implementation is up to $10 \times$, and the Softmax implementation inside the fused kernel is approximately $1.8 \times$ faster than the dedicated Softmax kernel. The time and memory complexity of all implementations is quadratic in sequence length. Currently, the Grayskull e150 is approximately $30 \times$ cheaper for the general public than an Nvidia H100 PCIe (a state-of-the-art GPU) and offers approximately $1.5 \times$ more SRAM.
title Attention in SRAM on Tenstorrent Grayskull
topic Machine Learning
Performance
I.2.6
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13885