Interplay between two mechanisms of resistivity

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kapustin, Anton, Falkovich, Gregory
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866929432556470272
author Kapustin, Anton
Falkovich, Gregory
author_facet Kapustin, Anton
Falkovich, Gregory
contents Mechanisms of resistivity can be divided into two basic classes: one is dissipative (like scattering on phonons) and another is quasi-elastic (like scattering on static impurities). They are often treated by the empirical Matthiessen rule, which says that total resistivity is just the sum of these two contributions, which are computed separately. This is quite misleading for two reasons. First, the two mechanisms are generally correlated. Second, computing the elastic resistivity alone masks the fundamental fact that the linear-response approximation has a vanishing validity interval at vanishing dissipation. Limits of zero electric field and zero dissipation do not commute for the simple reason that one needs to absorb the Joule heat quadratic in the applied field. Here, we present a simple model that illustrates these two points. The model also illuminates the role of variational principles for non-equilibrium steady states.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_16284
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Interplay between two mechanisms of resistivity
Kapustin, Anton
Falkovich, Gregory
Statistical Mechanics
Disordered Systems and Neural Networks
Chaotic Dynamics
Mechanisms of resistivity can be divided into two basic classes: one is dissipative (like scattering on phonons) and another is quasi-elastic (like scattering on static impurities). They are often treated by the empirical Matthiessen rule, which says that total resistivity is just the sum of these two contributions, which are computed separately. This is quite misleading for two reasons. First, the two mechanisms are generally correlated. Second, computing the elastic resistivity alone masks the fundamental fact that the linear-response approximation has a vanishing validity interval at vanishing dissipation. Limits of zero electric field and zero dissipation do not commute for the simple reason that one needs to absorb the Joule heat quadratic in the applied field. Here, we present a simple model that illustrates these two points. The model also illuminates the role of variational principles for non-equilibrium steady states.
title Interplay between two mechanisms of resistivity
topic Statistical Mechanics
Disordered Systems and Neural Networks
Chaotic Dynamics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16284