Quality Assured: Rethinking Annotation Strategies in Imaging AI

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Rädsch, Tim, Reinke, Annika, Weru, Vivienn, Tizabi, Minu D., Heller, Nicholas, Isensee, Fabian, Kopp-Schneider, Annette, Maier-Hein, Lena
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866909268927578112
author Rädsch, Tim
Reinke, Annika
Weru, Vivienn
Tizabi, Minu D.
Heller, Nicholas
Isensee, Fabian
Kopp-Schneider, Annette
Maier-Hein, Lena
author_facet Rädsch, Tim
Reinke, Annika
Weru, Vivienn
Tizabi, Minu D.
Heller, Nicholas
Isensee, Fabian
Kopp-Schneider, Annette
Maier-Hein, Lena
contents This paper does not describe a novel method. Instead, it studies an essential foundation for reliable benchmarking and ultimately real-world application of AI-based image analysis: generating high-quality reference annotations. Previous research has focused on crowdsourcing as a means of outsourcing annotations. However, little attention has so far been given to annotation companies, specifically regarding their internal quality assurance (QA) processes. Therefore, our aim is to evaluate the influence of QA employed by annotation companies on annotation quality and devise methodologies for maximizing data annotation efficacy. Based on a total of 57,648 instance segmented images obtained from a total of 924 annotators and 34 QA workers from four annotation companies and Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), we derived the following insights: (1) Annotation companies perform better both in terms of quantity and quality compared to the widely used platform MTurk. (2) Annotation companies' internal QA only provides marginal improvements, if any. However, improving labeling instructions instead of investing in QA can substantially boost annotation performance. (3) The benefit of internal QA depends on specific image characteristics. Our work could enable researchers to derive substantially more value from a fixed annotation budget and change the way annotation companies conduct internal QA.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_17596
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Quality Assured: Rethinking Annotation Strategies in Imaging AI
Rädsch, Tim
Reinke, Annika
Weru, Vivienn
Tizabi, Minu D.
Heller, Nicholas
Isensee, Fabian
Kopp-Schneider, Annette
Maier-Hein, Lena
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
This paper does not describe a novel method. Instead, it studies an essential foundation for reliable benchmarking and ultimately real-world application of AI-based image analysis: generating high-quality reference annotations. Previous research has focused on crowdsourcing as a means of outsourcing annotations. However, little attention has so far been given to annotation companies, specifically regarding their internal quality assurance (QA) processes. Therefore, our aim is to evaluate the influence of QA employed by annotation companies on annotation quality and devise methodologies for maximizing data annotation efficacy. Based on a total of 57,648 instance segmented images obtained from a total of 924 annotators and 34 QA workers from four annotation companies and Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), we derived the following insights: (1) Annotation companies perform better both in terms of quantity and quality compared to the widely used platform MTurk. (2) Annotation companies' internal QA only provides marginal improvements, if any. However, improving labeling instructions instead of investing in QA can substantially boost annotation performance. (3) The benefit of internal QA depends on specific image characteristics. Our work could enable researchers to derive substantially more value from a fixed annotation budget and change the way annotation companies conduct internal QA.
title Quality Assured: Rethinking Annotation Strategies in Imaging AI
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.17596