Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19406 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913450182049792 |
|---|---|
| author | Phillips, Samantha C. Ng, Lynnette Hui Xian Zhou, Wenqi Carley, Kathleen M. |
| author_facet | Phillips, Samantha C. Ng, Lynnette Hui Xian Zhou, Wenqi Carley, Kathleen M. |
| contents | Effective public health messaging benefits from understanding antecedents to unstable attitudes that are more likely to be influenced. This work investigates the relationship between moral and emotional bases for attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines and variance in stance. Evaluating nearly 1 million X users over a two month period, we find that emotional language in tweets about COVID-19 vaccines is largely associated with more variation in stance of the posting user, except anger and surprise. The strength of COVID-19 vaccine attitudes associated with moral values varies across foundations. Most notably, liberty is consistently used by users with no or less variation in stance, while fairness and sanctity are used by users with more variation. Our work has implications for designing constructive pro-vaccine messaging and identifying receptive audiences. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2407_19406 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Moral and emotional influences on attitude stability towards COVID-19 vaccines on social media Phillips, Samantha C. Ng, Lynnette Hui Xian Zhou, Wenqi Carley, Kathleen M. Computers and Society Effective public health messaging benefits from understanding antecedents to unstable attitudes that are more likely to be influenced. This work investigates the relationship between moral and emotional bases for attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines and variance in stance. Evaluating nearly 1 million X users over a two month period, we find that emotional language in tweets about COVID-19 vaccines is largely associated with more variation in stance of the posting user, except anger and surprise. The strength of COVID-19 vaccine attitudes associated with moral values varies across foundations. Most notably, liberty is consistently used by users with no or less variation in stance, while fairness and sanctity are used by users with more variation. Our work has implications for designing constructive pro-vaccine messaging and identifying receptive audiences. |
| title | Moral and emotional influences on attitude stability towards COVID-19 vaccines on social media |
| topic | Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19406 |