Loop percolation versus link percolation in the random loop model

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Betz, Volker, Klippel, Andreas, Kraft, Mino Nicola
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866915498301587456
author Betz, Volker
Klippel, Andreas
Kraft, Mino Nicola
author_facet Betz, Volker
Klippel, Andreas
Kraft, Mino Nicola
contents In [Muhl2019], Peter Mühlbacher showed that in the random loop model without loop weights, a loop phase transition (assuming it exists) cannot occur at the same parameter as the percolation phase transition of the occupied edges. In this work, we give a quantitative version of this result, specifying a minimal gap between the percolation phase transition and a possible loop phase transition. A substantial part of our argument also works for weighted loop models.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2408_00648
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Loop percolation versus link percolation in the random loop model
Betz, Volker
Klippel, Andreas
Kraft, Mino Nicola
Probability
In [Muhl2019], Peter Mühlbacher showed that in the random loop model without loop weights, a loop phase transition (assuming it exists) cannot occur at the same parameter as the percolation phase transition of the occupied edges. In this work, we give a quantitative version of this result, specifying a minimal gap between the percolation phase transition and a possible loop phase transition. A substantial part of our argument also works for weighted loop models.
title Loop percolation versus link percolation in the random loop model
topic Probability
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00648