Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kozachynskyi, Volodymyr, Hoffmann, Christian, Esche, Erik
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07844
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866910760666398720
author Kozachynskyi, Volodymyr
Hoffmann, Christian
Esche, Erik
author_facet Kozachynskyi, Volodymyr
Hoffmann, Christian
Esche, Erik
contents New vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) data are continuously being measured and new parameter values, e.g., for the nonrandom two-liquid (NRTL) model are estimated and published. The parameter $α$, the nonrandomness parameter of NRTL, is often heuristically fixed to a value in the range of 0.1 to 0.47. This can be seen as a manual application of a (subset selection) regularization method. In this work, the identifiability of the NRTL model for describing the VLE is analyzed. It is shown that fixing $α$ is not always a good decision and sometimes leads to worse prediction properties of the final parameter estimates. Popular regularization techniques are compared and Generalized Orthogonalization is proposed as an alternative to this heuristic. In addition, the sequential Optimal Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation (sOED-PE) method is applied to study the influence of the regularization methods on the performance of the sOED-PE loop.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2408_07844
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Why fixing alpha in the NRTL model might be a bad idea -- Identifiability analysis of a binary Vapor-Liquid equilibrium
Kozachynskyi, Volodymyr
Hoffmann, Christian
Esche, Erik
Optimization and Control
New vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) data are continuously being measured and new parameter values, e.g., for the nonrandom two-liquid (NRTL) model are estimated and published. The parameter $α$, the nonrandomness parameter of NRTL, is often heuristically fixed to a value in the range of 0.1 to 0.47. This can be seen as a manual application of a (subset selection) regularization method. In this work, the identifiability of the NRTL model for describing the VLE is analyzed. It is shown that fixing $α$ is not always a good decision and sometimes leads to worse prediction properties of the final parameter estimates. Popular regularization techniques are compared and Generalized Orthogonalization is proposed as an alternative to this heuristic. In addition, the sequential Optimal Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation (sOED-PE) method is applied to study the influence of the regularization methods on the performance of the sOED-PE loop.
title Why fixing alpha in the NRTL model might be a bad idea -- Identifiability analysis of a binary Vapor-Liquid equilibrium
topic Optimization and Control
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07844