Training Language Models on the Knowledge Graph: Insights on Hallucinations and Their Detectability

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hron, Jiri, Culp, Laura, Elsayed, Gamaleldin, Liu, Rosanne, Adlam, Ben, Bileschi, Maxwell, Bohnet, Bernd, Co-Reyes, JD, Fiedel, Noah, Freeman, C. Daniel, Gur, Izzeddin, Kenealy, Kathleen, Lee, Jaehoon, Liu, Peter J., Mishra, Gaurav, Mordatch, Igor, Nova, Azade, Novak, Roman, Parisi, Aaron, Pennington, Jeffrey, Rizkowsky, Alex, Simpson, Isabelle, Sedghi, Hanie, Sohl-dickstein, Jascha, Swersky, Kevin, Vikram, Sharad, Warkentin, Tris, Xiao, Lechao, Xu, Kelvin, Snoek, Jasper, Kornblith, Simon
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866929460088930304
author Hron, Jiri
Culp, Laura
Elsayed, Gamaleldin
Liu, Rosanne
Adlam, Ben
Bileschi, Maxwell
Bohnet, Bernd
Co-Reyes, JD
Fiedel, Noah
Freeman, C. Daniel
Gur, Izzeddin
Kenealy, Kathleen
Lee, Jaehoon
Liu, Peter J.
Mishra, Gaurav
Mordatch, Igor
Nova, Azade
Novak, Roman
Parisi, Aaron
Pennington, Jeffrey
Rizkowsky, Alex
Simpson, Isabelle
Sedghi, Hanie
Sohl-dickstein, Jascha
Swersky, Kevin
Vikram, Sharad
Warkentin, Tris
Xiao, Lechao
Xu, Kelvin
Snoek, Jasper
Kornblith, Simon
author_facet Hron, Jiri
Culp, Laura
Elsayed, Gamaleldin
Liu, Rosanne
Adlam, Ben
Bileschi, Maxwell
Bohnet, Bernd
Co-Reyes, JD
Fiedel, Noah
Freeman, C. Daniel
Gur, Izzeddin
Kenealy, Kathleen
Lee, Jaehoon
Liu, Peter J.
Mishra, Gaurav
Mordatch, Igor
Nova, Azade
Novak, Roman
Parisi, Aaron
Pennington, Jeffrey
Rizkowsky, Alex
Simpson, Isabelle
Sedghi, Hanie
Sohl-dickstein, Jascha
Swersky, Kevin
Vikram, Sharad
Warkentin, Tris
Xiao, Lechao
Xu, Kelvin
Snoek, Jasper
Kornblith, Simon
contents While many capabilities of language models (LMs) improve with increased training budget, the influence of scale on hallucinations is not yet fully understood. Hallucinations come in many forms, and there is no universally accepted definition. We thus focus on studying only those hallucinations where a correct answer appears verbatim in the training set. To fully control the training data content, we construct a knowledge graph (KG)-based dataset, and use it to train a set of increasingly large LMs. We find that for a fixed dataset, larger and longer-trained LMs hallucinate less. However, hallucinating on $\leq5$% of the training data requires an order of magnitude larger model, and thus an order of magnitude more compute, than Hoffmann et al. (2022) reported was optimal. Given this costliness, we study how hallucination detectors depend on scale. While we see detector size improves performance on fixed LM's outputs, we find an inverse relationship between the scale of the LM and the detectability of its hallucinations.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2408_07852
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Training Language Models on the Knowledge Graph: Insights on Hallucinations and Their Detectability
Hron, Jiri
Culp, Laura
Elsayed, Gamaleldin
Liu, Rosanne
Adlam, Ben
Bileschi, Maxwell
Bohnet, Bernd
Co-Reyes, JD
Fiedel, Noah
Freeman, C. Daniel
Gur, Izzeddin
Kenealy, Kathleen
Lee, Jaehoon
Liu, Peter J.
Mishra, Gaurav
Mordatch, Igor
Nova, Azade
Novak, Roman
Parisi, Aaron
Pennington, Jeffrey
Rizkowsky, Alex
Simpson, Isabelle
Sedghi, Hanie
Sohl-dickstein, Jascha
Swersky, Kevin
Vikram, Sharad
Warkentin, Tris
Xiao, Lechao
Xu, Kelvin
Snoek, Jasper
Kornblith, Simon
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
While many capabilities of language models (LMs) improve with increased training budget, the influence of scale on hallucinations is not yet fully understood. Hallucinations come in many forms, and there is no universally accepted definition. We thus focus on studying only those hallucinations where a correct answer appears verbatim in the training set. To fully control the training data content, we construct a knowledge graph (KG)-based dataset, and use it to train a set of increasingly large LMs. We find that for a fixed dataset, larger and longer-trained LMs hallucinate less. However, hallucinating on $\leq5$% of the training data requires an order of magnitude larger model, and thus an order of magnitude more compute, than Hoffmann et al. (2022) reported was optimal. Given this costliness, we study how hallucination detectors depend on scale. While we see detector size improves performance on fixed LM's outputs, we find an inverse relationship between the scale of the LM and the detectability of its hallucinations.
title Training Language Models on the Knowledge Graph: Insights on Hallucinations and Their Detectability
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07852