Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moore, Kyle, Roberts, Jesse, Pham, Thao, Fisher, Douglas
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08651
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915438536949760
author Moore, Kyle
Roberts, Jesse
Pham, Thao
Fisher, Douglas
author_facet Moore, Kyle
Roberts, Jesse
Pham, Thao
Fisher, Douglas
contents Language models are known to absorb biases from their training data, leading to predictions driven by statistical regularities rather than semantic relevance. We investigate the impact of these biases on answer choice preferences in the Massive Multi-Task Language Understanding (MMLU) task. Our findings show that these biases are predictive of model preference and mirror human test-taking strategies even when chain of thought (CoT) reasoning is used. To address this issue, we introduce Counterfactual Prompting with Agnostically Primed CoT (APriCoT). We demonstrate that while Counterfactual Prompting with CoT alone is insufficient to mitigate bias, APriCoT effectively reduces the influence of base-rate probabilities while improving overall accuracy. Our results suggest that mitigating bias requires a slow thinking process which CoT alone may not provide as it tends to reinforce fast thinking model bias under some prompting methodologies. APriCoT is a step toward developing more robust and fair language models that can think slow.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2408_08651
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Chain of Thought Still Thinks Fast: APriCoT Helps with Thinking Slow
Moore, Kyle
Roberts, Jesse
Pham, Thao
Fisher, Douglas
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Language models are known to absorb biases from their training data, leading to predictions driven by statistical regularities rather than semantic relevance. We investigate the impact of these biases on answer choice preferences in the Massive Multi-Task Language Understanding (MMLU) task. Our findings show that these biases are predictive of model preference and mirror human test-taking strategies even when chain of thought (CoT) reasoning is used. To address this issue, we introduce Counterfactual Prompting with Agnostically Primed CoT (APriCoT). We demonstrate that while Counterfactual Prompting with CoT alone is insufficient to mitigate bias, APriCoT effectively reduces the influence of base-rate probabilities while improving overall accuracy. Our results suggest that mitigating bias requires a slow thinking process which CoT alone may not provide as it tends to reinforce fast thinking model bias under some prompting methodologies. APriCoT is a step toward developing more robust and fair language models that can think slow.
title Chain of Thought Still Thinks Fast: APriCoT Helps with Thinking Slow
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08651