When Trust is Zero Sum: Automation Threat to Epistemic Agency

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Malone, Emmie, Afroogh, Saleh, DCruz, Jason, Varshney, Kush R
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866929462783770624
author Malone, Emmie
Afroogh, Saleh
DCruz, Jason
Varshney, Kush R
author_facet Malone, Emmie
Afroogh, Saleh
DCruz, Jason
Varshney, Kush R
contents AI researchers and ethicists have long worried about the threat that automation poses to human dignity, autonomy, and to the sense of personal value that is tied to work. Typically, proposed solutions to this problem focus on ways in which we can reduce the number of job losses which result from automation, ways to retrain those that lose their jobs, or ways to mitigate the social consequences of those job losses. However, even in cases where workers keep their jobs, their agency within them might be severely downgraded. For instance, human employees might work alongside AI but not be allowed to make decisions or not be allowed to make decisions without consulting with or coming to agreement with the AI. This is a kind of epistemic harm (which could be an injustice if it is distributed on the basis of identity prejudice). It diminishes human agency (in constraining people's ability to act independently), and it fails to recognize the workers' epistemic agency as qualified experts. Workers, in this case, aren't given the trust they are entitled to. This means that issues of human dignity remain even in cases where everyone keeps their job. Further, job retention focused solutions, such as designing an algorithm to work alongside the human employee, may only enable these harms. Here, we propose an alternative design solution, adversarial collaboration, which addresses the traditional retention problem of automation, but also addresses the larger underlying problem of epistemic harms and the distribution of trust between AI and humans in the workplace.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2408_08846
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle When Trust is Zero Sum: Automation Threat to Epistemic Agency
Malone, Emmie
Afroogh, Saleh
DCruz, Jason
Varshney, Kush R
Computers and Society
AI researchers and ethicists have long worried about the threat that automation poses to human dignity, autonomy, and to the sense of personal value that is tied to work. Typically, proposed solutions to this problem focus on ways in which we can reduce the number of job losses which result from automation, ways to retrain those that lose their jobs, or ways to mitigate the social consequences of those job losses. However, even in cases where workers keep their jobs, their agency within them might be severely downgraded. For instance, human employees might work alongside AI but not be allowed to make decisions or not be allowed to make decisions without consulting with or coming to agreement with the AI. This is a kind of epistemic harm (which could be an injustice if it is distributed on the basis of identity prejudice). It diminishes human agency (in constraining people's ability to act independently), and it fails to recognize the workers' epistemic agency as qualified experts. Workers, in this case, aren't given the trust they are entitled to. This means that issues of human dignity remain even in cases where everyone keeps their job. Further, job retention focused solutions, such as designing an algorithm to work alongside the human employee, may only enable these harms. Here, we propose an alternative design solution, adversarial collaboration, which addresses the traditional retention problem of automation, but also addresses the larger underlying problem of epistemic harms and the distribution of trust between AI and humans in the workplace.
title When Trust is Zero Sum: Automation Threat to Epistemic Agency
topic Computers and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08846