Airfoil Synchronous Surging and Pitching
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908330488758272 |
|---|---|
| author | Strangfeld, C. Müller-Vahl, H. F. Nayeri, C. N. Paschereit, C. O. Greenblatt, D. |
| author_facet | Strangfeld, C. Müller-Vahl, H. F. Nayeri, C. N. Paschereit, C. O. Greenblatt, D. |
| contents | Combined pitching-and-surging of an airfoil at the identical frequency (i.e., synchronously), at four different phase-differences, was investigated theoretically and experimentally. The most general unsteady theoretical formulation was adopted to calculate the lift coefficient, and then extended to explicitly compute the unsteady bound vortex sheet. This was used for comparison to experiments and facilitated the computation of both Joukowsky and impulsive-pressure lift contributions. Experiments were performed using a NACA 0018 airfoil in an unsteady wind tunnel at an average Reynolds number of $3.0 \times 10^5$, with a free-stream oscillation amplitude of 0.51, an angle-of-attack range of $2^\circ \pm 2^\circ$, and a reduced frequency of 0.097. In general, excellent correspondence was observed between theory and experiment, representing the first direct experimental validation of the general theory. It was shown, both theoretically and experimentally, that the lift coefficient was not accurately represented by independent superposition of surging and pitching effects, due to variations in the instantaneous effective reduced frequency not accounted for during pure pitching. Deviations from theory, observed at phase-lags of $90^\circ$ and $180^\circ$ were attributed to bursting of separation bubbles during the early stages of the acceleration phase. The largest deviations occurred when the impulsive-pressure lift contribution was small relative to the Joukowsky contribution, because the latter was most affected by bubble-bursting. Bubble-bursting resulted in large form-drag oscillations that occurred at identical phase angles within the oscillation cycle, irrespective of the phase difference between surging and pitching, as well as in the absence of pitching. The bubble-bursting dynamic stall mechanism may have important implications for rotor performance and noise emissions. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2408_10675 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Airfoil Synchronous Surging and Pitching Strangfeld, C. Müller-Vahl, H. F. Nayeri, C. N. Paschereit, C. O. Greenblatt, D. Fluid Dynamics Combined pitching-and-surging of an airfoil at the identical frequency (i.e., synchronously), at four different phase-differences, was investigated theoretically and experimentally. The most general unsteady theoretical formulation was adopted to calculate the lift coefficient, and then extended to explicitly compute the unsteady bound vortex sheet. This was used for comparison to experiments and facilitated the computation of both Joukowsky and impulsive-pressure lift contributions. Experiments were performed using a NACA 0018 airfoil in an unsteady wind tunnel at an average Reynolds number of $3.0 \times 10^5$, with a free-stream oscillation amplitude of 0.51, an angle-of-attack range of $2^\circ \pm 2^\circ$, and a reduced frequency of 0.097. In general, excellent correspondence was observed between theory and experiment, representing the first direct experimental validation of the general theory. It was shown, both theoretically and experimentally, that the lift coefficient was not accurately represented by independent superposition of surging and pitching effects, due to variations in the instantaneous effective reduced frequency not accounted for during pure pitching. Deviations from theory, observed at phase-lags of $90^\circ$ and $180^\circ$ were attributed to bursting of separation bubbles during the early stages of the acceleration phase. The largest deviations occurred when the impulsive-pressure lift contribution was small relative to the Joukowsky contribution, because the latter was most affected by bubble-bursting. Bubble-bursting resulted in large form-drag oscillations that occurred at identical phase angles within the oscillation cycle, irrespective of the phase difference between surging and pitching, as well as in the absence of pitching. The bubble-bursting dynamic stall mechanism may have important implications for rotor performance and noise emissions. |
| title | Airfoil Synchronous Surging and Pitching |
| topic | Fluid Dynamics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10675 |