Do Neural Scaling Laws Exist on Graph Self-Supervised Learning?

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ma, Qian, Mao, Haitao, Liu, Jingzhe, Zhang, Zhehua, Feng, Chunlin, Song, Yu, Shao, Yihan, Ma, Yao
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910577708761088
author Ma, Qian
Mao, Haitao
Liu, Jingzhe
Zhang, Zhehua
Feng, Chunlin
Song, Yu
Shao, Yihan
Ma, Yao
author_facet Ma, Qian
Mao, Haitao
Liu, Jingzhe
Zhang, Zhehua
Feng, Chunlin
Song, Yu
Shao, Yihan
Ma, Yao
contents Self-supervised learning~(SSL) is essential to obtain foundation models in NLP and CV domains via effectively leveraging knowledge in large-scale unlabeled data. The reason for its success is that a suitable SSL design can help the model to follow the neural scaling law, i.e., the performance consistently improves with increasing model and dataset sizes. However, it remains a mystery whether existing SSL in the graph domain can follow the scaling behavior toward building Graph Foundation Models~(GFMs) with large-scale pre-training. In this study, we examine whether existing graph SSL techniques can follow the neural scaling behavior with the potential to serve as the essential component for GFMs. Our benchmark includes comprehensive SSL technique implementations with analysis conducted on both the conventional SSL setting and many new settings adopted in other domains. Surprisingly, despite the SSL loss continuously decreasing, no existing graph SSL techniques follow the neural scaling behavior on the downstream performance. The model performance only merely fluctuates on different data scales and model scales. Instead of the scales, the key factors influencing the performance are the choices of model architecture and pretext task design. This paper examines existing SSL techniques for the feasibility of Graph SSL techniques in developing GFMs and opens a new direction for graph SSL design with the new evaluation prototype. Our code implementation is available online to ease reproducibility on https://github.com/GraphSSLScaling/GraphSSLScaling.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2408_11243
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Do Neural Scaling Laws Exist on Graph Self-Supervised Learning?
Ma, Qian
Mao, Haitao
Liu, Jingzhe
Zhang, Zhehua
Feng, Chunlin
Song, Yu
Shao, Yihan
Ma, Yao
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Self-supervised learning~(SSL) is essential to obtain foundation models in NLP and CV domains via effectively leveraging knowledge in large-scale unlabeled data. The reason for its success is that a suitable SSL design can help the model to follow the neural scaling law, i.e., the performance consistently improves with increasing model and dataset sizes. However, it remains a mystery whether existing SSL in the graph domain can follow the scaling behavior toward building Graph Foundation Models~(GFMs) with large-scale pre-training. In this study, we examine whether existing graph SSL techniques can follow the neural scaling behavior with the potential to serve as the essential component for GFMs. Our benchmark includes comprehensive SSL technique implementations with analysis conducted on both the conventional SSL setting and many new settings adopted in other domains. Surprisingly, despite the SSL loss continuously decreasing, no existing graph SSL techniques follow the neural scaling behavior on the downstream performance. The model performance only merely fluctuates on different data scales and model scales. Instead of the scales, the key factors influencing the performance are the choices of model architecture and pretext task design. This paper examines existing SSL techniques for the feasibility of Graph SSL techniques in developing GFMs and opens a new direction for graph SSL design with the new evaluation prototype. Our code implementation is available online to ease reproducibility on https://github.com/GraphSSLScaling/GraphSSLScaling.
title Do Neural Scaling Laws Exist on Graph Self-Supervised Learning?
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11243