_version_ 1866929469094100992
author Jenniskens, Peter
Estrada, Paul R.
Pilorz, Stuart
Gural, Peter S.
Samuels, Dave
Rau, Steve
Abbott, Timothy M. C.
Albers, Jim
Austin, Scott
Avner, Dan
Baggaley, Jack W.
Beck, Tim
Blomquist, Solvay
Boyukata, Mustafa
Breukers, Martin
Cooney, Walt
Cooper, Tim
De Cicco, Marcelo
Devillepoix, Hadrien
Egland, Eric
Fahl, Elize
Gialluca, Megan
Grigsby, Bryant
Hanke, Toni
Harris, Barbara
Heathcote, Steve
Hemmelgarn, Samantha
Howell, Andy
Jehin, Emmanuel
Johannink, Carl
Juneau, Luke
Kisvarsanyi, Erika
Mey, Philip
Moskovitz, Nick
Odeh, Mohammad
Rachford, Brian
Rollinson, David
Scott, James M.
Towner, Martin C.
Unsalan, Ozan
van Wyk, Rynault
Wood, Jeff
Wray, James D.
Pavao, C.
Lauretta, Dante S.
author_facet Jenniskens, Peter
Estrada, Paul R.
Pilorz, Stuart
Gural, Peter S.
Samuels, Dave
Rau, Steve
Abbott, Timothy M. C.
Albers, Jim
Austin, Scott
Avner, Dan
Baggaley, Jack W.
Beck, Tim
Blomquist, Solvay
Boyukata, Mustafa
Breukers, Martin
Cooney, Walt
Cooper, Tim
De Cicco, Marcelo
Devillepoix, Hadrien
Egland, Eric
Fahl, Elize
Gialluca, Megan
Grigsby, Bryant
Hanke, Toni
Harris, Barbara
Heathcote, Steve
Hemmelgarn, Samantha
Howell, Andy
Jehin, Emmanuel
Johannink, Carl
Juneau, Luke
Kisvarsanyi, Erika
Mey, Philip
Moskovitz, Nick
Odeh, Mohammad
Rachford, Brian
Rollinson, David
Scott, James M.
Towner, Martin C.
Unsalan, Ozan
van Wyk, Rynault
Wood, Jeff
Wray, James D.
Pavao, C.
Lauretta, Dante S.
contents In the late stages of accretion leading up to the formation of planetesimals, particles grew to pebbles the size of 1-mm to tens of cm. That is the same size range that dominates the present-day comet mass loss. Meteoroids that size cause visible meteors on Earth. Here, we hypothesize that the size distribution and the physical and chemical properties of young meteoroid streams still contain information about the conditions in the solar nebula during these late stages of accretion. From observations of 47 young meteor showers, we find that freshly ejected meteoroids from long-period comets tend to have low bulk density and are distributed with equal surface area per log-mass interval (magnitude distribution index chi ~ 1.85), suggesting gentle accretion conditions. Jupiter-family comets, on the other hand, mostly produce meteoroids twice as dense and distributed with a steeper chi ~ 2.15 or even chi ~ 2.5, which implies that those pebbles grew from particles fragmenting in a collisional cascade or by catastrophic collisions, respectively. Both comet populations contain an admixture of compact materials that are sometimes sodium-poor, but Jupiter-family comets show a higher percentage (~8% on average) than long-period comet showers (~4%), and a wider range. While there are exceptions in both groups, the implication is that most long-period comets formed under gentle particle growth conditions, possibly near the 30 AU edge of the Trans Neptunian Disk, while most Jupiter family comets formed closer to the Sun where pebbles reached or passed the fragmentation barrier. This is possible if the Scattered Disk represents all objects scattered by Neptune during its migration, while the present-day outer Oort cloud formed only during and after the Sun had moved away from sibling stars.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2408_11945
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Properties of outer solar system pebbles during planetesimal formation from meteor observations
Jenniskens, Peter
Estrada, Paul R.
Pilorz, Stuart
Gural, Peter S.
Samuels, Dave
Rau, Steve
Abbott, Timothy M. C.
Albers, Jim
Austin, Scott
Avner, Dan
Baggaley, Jack W.
Beck, Tim
Blomquist, Solvay
Boyukata, Mustafa
Breukers, Martin
Cooney, Walt
Cooper, Tim
De Cicco, Marcelo
Devillepoix, Hadrien
Egland, Eric
Fahl, Elize
Gialluca, Megan
Grigsby, Bryant
Hanke, Toni
Harris, Barbara
Heathcote, Steve
Hemmelgarn, Samantha
Howell, Andy
Jehin, Emmanuel
Johannink, Carl
Juneau, Luke
Kisvarsanyi, Erika
Mey, Philip
Moskovitz, Nick
Odeh, Mohammad
Rachford, Brian
Rollinson, David
Scott, James M.
Towner, Martin C.
Unsalan, Ozan
van Wyk, Rynault
Wood, Jeff
Wray, James D.
Pavao, C.
Lauretta, Dante S.
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
85
In the late stages of accretion leading up to the formation of planetesimals, particles grew to pebbles the size of 1-mm to tens of cm. That is the same size range that dominates the present-day comet mass loss. Meteoroids that size cause visible meteors on Earth. Here, we hypothesize that the size distribution and the physical and chemical properties of young meteoroid streams still contain information about the conditions in the solar nebula during these late stages of accretion. From observations of 47 young meteor showers, we find that freshly ejected meteoroids from long-period comets tend to have low bulk density and are distributed with equal surface area per log-mass interval (magnitude distribution index chi ~ 1.85), suggesting gentle accretion conditions. Jupiter-family comets, on the other hand, mostly produce meteoroids twice as dense and distributed with a steeper chi ~ 2.15 or even chi ~ 2.5, which implies that those pebbles grew from particles fragmenting in a collisional cascade or by catastrophic collisions, respectively. Both comet populations contain an admixture of compact materials that are sometimes sodium-poor, but Jupiter-family comets show a higher percentage (~8% on average) than long-period comet showers (~4%), and a wider range. While there are exceptions in both groups, the implication is that most long-period comets formed under gentle particle growth conditions, possibly near the 30 AU edge of the Trans Neptunian Disk, while most Jupiter family comets formed closer to the Sun where pebbles reached or passed the fragmentation barrier. This is possible if the Scattered Disk represents all objects scattered by Neptune during its migration, while the present-day outer Oort cloud formed only during and after the Sun had moved away from sibling stars.
title Properties of outer solar system pebbles during planetesimal formation from meteor observations
topic Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
85
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11945