Balancing Act: Prioritization Strategies for LLM-Designed Restless Bandit Rewards

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Verma, Shresth, Boehmer, Niclas, Kong, Lingkai, Tambe, Milind
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866915564565299200
author Verma, Shresth
Boehmer, Niclas
Kong, Lingkai
Tambe, Milind
author_facet Verma, Shresth
Boehmer, Niclas
Kong, Lingkai
Tambe, Milind
contents LLMs are increasingly used to design reward functions based on human preferences in Reinforcement Learning (RL). We focus on LLM-designed rewards for Restless Multi-Armed Bandits, a framework for allocating limited resources among agents. In applications such as public health, this approach empowers grassroots health workers to tailor automated allocation decisions to community needs. In the presence of multiple agents, altering the reward function based on human preferences can impact subpopulations very differently, leading to complex tradeoffs and a multi-objective resource allocation problem. We are the first to present a principled method termed Social Choice Language Model for dealing with these tradeoffs for LLM-designed rewards for multiagent planners in general and restless bandits in particular. The novel part of our model is a transparent and configurable selection component, called an adjudicator, external to the LLM that controls complex tradeoffs via a user-selected social welfare function. Our experiments demonstrate that our model reliably selects more effective, aligned, and balanced reward functions compared to purely LLM-based approaches.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2408_12112
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Balancing Act: Prioritization Strategies for LLM-Designed Restless Bandit Rewards
Verma, Shresth
Boehmer, Niclas
Kong, Lingkai
Tambe, Milind
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Multiagent Systems
LLMs are increasingly used to design reward functions based on human preferences in Reinforcement Learning (RL). We focus on LLM-designed rewards for Restless Multi-Armed Bandits, a framework for allocating limited resources among agents. In applications such as public health, this approach empowers grassroots health workers to tailor automated allocation decisions to community needs. In the presence of multiple agents, altering the reward function based on human preferences can impact subpopulations very differently, leading to complex tradeoffs and a multi-objective resource allocation problem. We are the first to present a principled method termed Social Choice Language Model for dealing with these tradeoffs for LLM-designed rewards for multiagent planners in general and restless bandits in particular. The novel part of our model is a transparent and configurable selection component, called an adjudicator, external to the LLM that controls complex tradeoffs via a user-selected social welfare function. Our experiments demonstrate that our model reliably selects more effective, aligned, and balanced reward functions compared to purely LLM-based approaches.
title Balancing Act: Prioritization Strategies for LLM-Designed Restless Bandit Rewards
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Multiagent Systems
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12112