Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12184 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913476666982400 |
|---|---|
| author | Camadini, Louisa Bouzid, Yanis Merlet, Maeva Carron, Léopold |
| author_facet | Camadini, Louisa Bouzid, Yanis Merlet, Maeva Carron, Léopold |
| contents | When it comes to the safety of cosmetic products, compliance with regulatory standards is crucialto guarantee consumer protection against the risks of skin irritation. Toxicologists must thereforebe fully conversant with all risks. This applies not only to their day-to-day work, but also to allthe algorithms they integrate into their routines. Recognizing this, ensuring the reproducibility ofalgorithms becomes one of the most crucial aspects to address.However, how can we prove the robustness of an algorithm such as the random forest, that reliesheavily on randomness? In this report, we will discuss the strategy of integrating random forest intoocular tolerance assessment for toxicologists.We will compare four packages: randomForest and Ranger (R packages), adapted in Python via theSKRanger package, and the widely used Scikit-Learn with the RandomForestClassifier() function.Our goal is to investigate the parameters and sources of randomness affecting the outcomes ofRandom Forest algorithms.By setting comparable parameters and using the same Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG),we expect to reproduce results consistently across the various available implementations of therandom forest algorithm. Nevertheless, this exploration will unveil hidden layers of randomness andguide our understanding of the critical parameters necessary to ensure reproducibility across all fourimplementations of the random forest algorithm. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2408_12184 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Randomness control and reproducibility study of random forest algorithm in R and Python Camadini, Louisa Bouzid, Yanis Merlet, Maeva Carron, Léopold Artificial Intelligence When it comes to the safety of cosmetic products, compliance with regulatory standards is crucialto guarantee consumer protection against the risks of skin irritation. Toxicologists must thereforebe fully conversant with all risks. This applies not only to their day-to-day work, but also to allthe algorithms they integrate into their routines. Recognizing this, ensuring the reproducibility ofalgorithms becomes one of the most crucial aspects to address.However, how can we prove the robustness of an algorithm such as the random forest, that reliesheavily on randomness? In this report, we will discuss the strategy of integrating random forest intoocular tolerance assessment for toxicologists.We will compare four packages: randomForest and Ranger (R packages), adapted in Python via theSKRanger package, and the widely used Scikit-Learn with the RandomForestClassifier() function.Our goal is to investigate the parameters and sources of randomness affecting the outcomes ofRandom Forest algorithms.By setting comparable parameters and using the same Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG),we expect to reproduce results consistently across the various available implementations of therandom forest algorithm. Nevertheless, this exploration will unveil hidden layers of randomness andguide our understanding of the critical parameters necessary to ensure reproducibility across all fourimplementations of the random forest algorithm. |
| title | Randomness control and reproducibility study of random forest algorithm in R and Python |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12184 |