Which Prosodic Features Matter Most for Pragmatics?
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914921583738880 |
|---|---|
| author | Ward, Nigel G. Marco, Divette Fuentes, Olac |
| author_facet | Ward, Nigel G. Marco, Divette Fuentes, Olac |
| contents | We investigate which prosodic features matter most in conveying prosodic functions. We use the problem of predicting human perceptions of pragmatic similarity among utterance pairs to evaluate the utility of prosodic features of different types. We find, for example, that duration-related features are more important than pitch-related features, and that utterance-initial features are more important than utterance-final features. Further, failure analysis indicates that modeling using pitch features only often fails to handle important pragmatic functions, and suggests that several generally-neglected acoustic and prosodic features are pragmatically significant, including nasality and vibrato. These findings can guide future basic research in prosody, and suggest how to improve speech synthesis evaluation, among other applications. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2408_13240 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Which Prosodic Features Matter Most for Pragmatics? Ward, Nigel G. Marco, Divette Fuentes, Olac Computation and Language Sound Audio and Speech Processing We investigate which prosodic features matter most in conveying prosodic functions. We use the problem of predicting human perceptions of pragmatic similarity among utterance pairs to evaluate the utility of prosodic features of different types. We find, for example, that duration-related features are more important than pitch-related features, and that utterance-initial features are more important than utterance-final features. Further, failure analysis indicates that modeling using pitch features only often fails to handle important pragmatic functions, and suggests that several generally-neglected acoustic and prosodic features are pragmatically significant, including nasality and vibrato. These findings can guide future basic research in prosody, and suggest how to improve speech synthesis evaluation, among other applications. |
| title | Which Prosodic Features Matter Most for Pragmatics? |
| topic | Computation and Language Sound Audio and Speech Processing |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13240 |