On the backward stability of s-step GMRES
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909649506140160 |
|---|---|
| author | Carson, Erin Ma, Yuxin |
| author_facet | Carson, Erin Ma, Yuxin |
| contents | Communication, i.e., data movement, is a critical bottleneck for the performance of classical Krylov subspace method solvers on modern computer architectures. Variants of these methods which avoid communication have been introduced, which, while equivalent in exact arithmetic, can be unstable in finite precision. In this work, we address the backward stability of $s$-step GMRES, also known as communication-avoiding GMRES. Compared to the ``modular framework'' proposed in [A.~Buttari, N.~J.~Higham, T.~Mary, \& B.~Vieublé. Preprint in 2024.], we present an improved framework for simplifying the analysis of $s$-step GMRES, which includes standard GMRES ($s=1$) as a special case, by isolating the effects of rounding errors in the QR factorization and the solution of the least squares problem. The key advantage of this new framework is that it is evident how the orthogonalization method affects the backward error, and it is not necessary to re-evaluate anything other than the orthogonalization itself when modifying the orthogonalization used in GMRES. Using this framework, we analyze $s$-step GMRES with popular block orthogonalization methods: block modified Gram--Schmidt and reorthogonalized block classical Gram--Schmidt algorithms.
An example illustrates the resulting instability of $s$-step GMRES when paired with the classical $s$-step Arnoldi process and shows the limitations of popular strategies for resolving this instability. To address this issue, we propose a modified $s$-step Arnoldi process that allows for much larger block size $s$ while maintaining satisfactory accuracy, as confirmed by our numerical experiments. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_03079 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | On the backward stability of s-step GMRES Carson, Erin Ma, Yuxin Numerical Analysis 65F10, 65F50, 65G50 Communication, i.e., data movement, is a critical bottleneck for the performance of classical Krylov subspace method solvers on modern computer architectures. Variants of these methods which avoid communication have been introduced, which, while equivalent in exact arithmetic, can be unstable in finite precision. In this work, we address the backward stability of $s$-step GMRES, also known as communication-avoiding GMRES. Compared to the ``modular framework'' proposed in [A.~Buttari, N.~J.~Higham, T.~Mary, \& B.~Vieublé. Preprint in 2024.], we present an improved framework for simplifying the analysis of $s$-step GMRES, which includes standard GMRES ($s=1$) as a special case, by isolating the effects of rounding errors in the QR factorization and the solution of the least squares problem. The key advantage of this new framework is that it is evident how the orthogonalization method affects the backward error, and it is not necessary to re-evaluate anything other than the orthogonalization itself when modifying the orthogonalization used in GMRES. Using this framework, we analyze $s$-step GMRES with popular block orthogonalization methods: block modified Gram--Schmidt and reorthogonalized block classical Gram--Schmidt algorithms. An example illustrates the resulting instability of $s$-step GMRES when paired with the classical $s$-step Arnoldi process and shows the limitations of popular strategies for resolving this instability. To address this issue, we propose a modified $s$-step Arnoldi process that allows for much larger block size $s$ while maintaining satisfactory accuracy, as confirmed by our numerical experiments. |
| title | On the backward stability of s-step GMRES |
| topic | Numerical Analysis 65F10, 65F50, 65G50 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03079 |