Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04808 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909307978645504 |
|---|---|
| author | Joshi, Prathamesh Dinesh Pocker, Sahil Dandekar, Raj Abhijit Dandekar, Rajat Panat, Sreedath |
| author_facet | Joshi, Prathamesh Dinesh Pocker, Sahil Dandekar, Raj Abhijit Dandekar, Rajat Panat, Sreedath |
| contents | As LLMs become increasingly proficient at producing human-like responses, there has been a rise of academic and industrial pursuits dedicated to flagging a given piece of text as "human" or "AI". Most of these pursuits involve modern NLP detectors like T5-Sentinel and RoBERTa-Sentinel, without paying too much attention to issues of interpretability and explainability of these models. In our study, we provide a comprehensive analysis that shows that traditional ML models (Naive-Bayes,MLP, Random Forests, XGBoost) perform as well as modern NLP detectors, in human vs AI text detection. We achieve this by implementing a robust testing procedure on diverse datasets, including curated corpora and real-world samples. Subsequently, by employing the explainable AI technique LIME, we uncover parts of the input that contribute most to the prediction of each model, providing insights into the detection process. Our study contributes to the growing need for developing production-level LLM detection tools, which can leverage a wide range of traditional as well as modern NLP detectors we propose. Finally, the LIME techniques we demonstrate also have the potential to equip these detection tools with interpretability analysis features, making them more reliable and trustworthy in various domains like education, healthcare, and media. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_04808 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | HULLMI: Human vs LLM identification with explainability Joshi, Prathamesh Dinesh Pocker, Sahil Dandekar, Raj Abhijit Dandekar, Rajat Panat, Sreedath Artificial Intelligence As LLMs become increasingly proficient at producing human-like responses, there has been a rise of academic and industrial pursuits dedicated to flagging a given piece of text as "human" or "AI". Most of these pursuits involve modern NLP detectors like T5-Sentinel and RoBERTa-Sentinel, without paying too much attention to issues of interpretability and explainability of these models. In our study, we provide a comprehensive analysis that shows that traditional ML models (Naive-Bayes,MLP, Random Forests, XGBoost) perform as well as modern NLP detectors, in human vs AI text detection. We achieve this by implementing a robust testing procedure on diverse datasets, including curated corpora and real-world samples. Subsequently, by employing the explainable AI technique LIME, we uncover parts of the input that contribute most to the prediction of each model, providing insights into the detection process. Our study contributes to the growing need for developing production-level LLM detection tools, which can leverage a wide range of traditional as well as modern NLP detectors we propose. Finally, the LIME techniques we demonstrate also have the potential to equip these detection tools with interpretability analysis features, making them more reliable and trustworthy in various domains like education, healthcare, and media. |
| title | HULLMI: Human vs LLM identification with explainability |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04808 |