Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hollender, Alexandros, Maystre, Gilbert, Nagarajan, Sai Ganesh
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07398
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910117569495040
author Hollender, Alexandros
Maystre, Gilbert
Nagarajan, Sai Ganesh
author_facet Hollender, Alexandros
Maystre, Gilbert
Nagarajan, Sai Ganesh
contents Adversarial multiplayer games are an important object of study in multiagent learning. In particular, polymatrix zero-sum games are a multiplayer setting where Nash equilibria are known to be efficiently computable. Towards understanding the limits of tractability in polymatrix games, we study the computation of Nash equilibria in such games where each pair of players plays either a zero-sum or a coordination game. We are particularly interested in the setting where players can be grouped into a small number of teams of identical interest. While the three-team version of the problem is known to be PPAD-complete, the complexity for two teams has remained open. Our main contribution is to prove that the two-team version remains hard, namely it is CLS-hard. Furthermore, we show that this lower bound is tight (i.e., CLS-membership) for the setting where one of the teams consists of multiple independent adversaries. By leveraging this result we also obtain a simple algorithm that finds an $\varepsilon$-Nash equilibrium and only has a $1/\varepsilon^2$ dependence in $\varepsilon$ in its running time. On the way to obtaining our main result, we prove hardness of finding any stationary point in the simplest type of non-convex-concave min-max constrained optimization problem, namely for a class of bilinear polynomial objective functions.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_07398
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle The Complexity of Two-Team Polymatrix Games with Independent Adversaries
Hollender, Alexandros
Maystre, Gilbert
Nagarajan, Sai Ganesh
Computer Science and Game Theory
Adversarial multiplayer games are an important object of study in multiagent learning. In particular, polymatrix zero-sum games are a multiplayer setting where Nash equilibria are known to be efficiently computable. Towards understanding the limits of tractability in polymatrix games, we study the computation of Nash equilibria in such games where each pair of players plays either a zero-sum or a coordination game. We are particularly interested in the setting where players can be grouped into a small number of teams of identical interest. While the three-team version of the problem is known to be PPAD-complete, the complexity for two teams has remained open. Our main contribution is to prove that the two-team version remains hard, namely it is CLS-hard. Furthermore, we show that this lower bound is tight (i.e., CLS-membership) for the setting where one of the teams consists of multiple independent adversaries. By leveraging this result we also obtain a simple algorithm that finds an $\varepsilon$-Nash equilibrium and only has a $1/\varepsilon^2$ dependence in $\varepsilon$ in its running time. On the way to obtaining our main result, we prove hardness of finding any stationary point in the simplest type of non-convex-concave min-max constrained optimization problem, namely for a class of bilinear polynomial objective functions.
title The Complexity of Two-Team Polymatrix Games with Independent Adversaries
topic Computer Science and Game Theory
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07398